 | | Re: Help for povray needed!
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes: <SNIP> Thank you steve! Over the week-end I had more time, and found exactly the same way, just in C++. But (how should it be different) there is another problem ... This works fine for pov-ray, with L3P this (...) (24 years ago, 23-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Syntax error in official part 754.dat?
|
|
(...) It is? Do you mean that the "strange" comment syntax I pointed out will be fixed? Or will you fix something else also? Fredrik (24 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: the parts 754.dat and 756.dat in the 8.5L hose
|
|
(...) Thanks for your effort! I would be happy if you find the time to process it some time, be it before or after the next update. Fredrik (24 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Hunt for missing primitives
|
|
(...) migth (...) Thanks gentlemen, the fresh download helped a lot :-) Ampi ---...--- Imre Papp Geometria GIS Systems House email: ipapp@geometria.hu ---...--- (24 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldglite is now homeless
|
|
(...) Even without the CVS sourceforge is a much more appropriate place for ldglite than geocities. I could always open up a zip/tar/gz hosting section in brickshelf, but then again, sourceforge would still be a much more appropriate place for it. (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: (Some) Parts which are in the update-pipeline
|
|
(...) My mistake. It is the 3 point crystal that is being voted on. (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Hunt for missing primitives
|
|
(...) after (...) Steve memory is excelent, he has drawn the complete picture. My brand new computer(1)didn't have Ldraw on it jet, and I've just tested the Ldraw.exe and Complete.exe downloads on it. The 3 primitives BOX4-1.DAT, BOX4-4A.DAT and (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldglite is now homeless
|
|
(...) I never said that CVS is a bad thing, it allows you to retrieve the source code for specific versions and have a backup in another place besides floppy disks. :) But it's not very useful if you're working alone. (...) I used to update the CVS (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Smoke-Clear color code
|
|
(...) According to my understanding of the color codes, this would be "40" (that is, 8 for Dark-Grey, plus 32 for transparency). Thanks, Franklin (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) I believe that's why I have drawn "overdraw3.png" ! ;) (...) Damn, I missed that one, but just need to split the pentagon into a quad and a triangle. (...) As I said, the disc as only 8 slices to simplify, with the regular 16 you would save (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Hunt for missing primitives
|
|
Imre, If I remember correctly, the 'BOX4_1.DAT' errors were noticed very shortly after the 98-07 update was released, and Terry replaced that update with a fixed version. I just downloaded LCAD9807.EXE and COMPLETE.EXE from www.ldraw.org, and both (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: (Some) Parts which are in the update-pipeline
|
|
(...) No, it isn't. The color-16 version is also in the backlog: (...) Steve (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: the parts 754.dat and 756.dat in the 8.5L hose
|
|
(...) That's correct. As long as I think it's ok, it goes into the update. I saw your message in my partsref inbox, but I haven't processed it yet. Steve (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with BFC
|
|
(...) I've looked at your files, and they seem to be OK. But it was a manual review, I didn't calculate the determinants of the transform reference matrices. At this point, it looks like a bug in the MLCad code. We'll have to wait to see if Michael (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Hunt for missing primitives
|
|
(...) I don't think I have this one... (...) I *do* have these. In fact, I used box4_1.dat yesterday...should I have called it something different? (...) This isn't a good solution, as the problem probably exists on many machines using LDraw... (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldglite is now homeless
|
|
(...) I have to disagree with you. I think a CVS repository on the internet will be a big help for me. I need a revision control system anyways to keep myself organized, even if nobody else uses it. Having it on the internet is a bonus since I can (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldglite is now homeless
|
|
(...) I moved my pages from Geocities a long time ago but I kept some files there to redirect users to my new page and to be a mirror site. And CVS is only good if you have more people helping you, to me it didn't help much. :) Leonardo (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Hunt for missing primitives
|
|
Hi all, Reviewing the new parts of the Vote 2000-1 I noticed that some primitives are missing from my machine. e.g. 'box4-1.dat' I reinstalled 'ldraw.exe' and all James' and Terry's updates, but this primitive wasn't there. However, 'lcad9807.exe' (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldglite is now homeless
|
|
(...) I already replied with an apology, but I think I'm going to give the sourceforge a try. I think CVS will help me organize things a bit. Plus I had plenty of problems connecting to geocities when I wanted to update the site there. Don (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldglite is now homeless
|
|
(...) I was thinking the same thing. I already registered the project there and am currently waiting for the project to be approved. I can't wait to get access to the CVS. That's gonna make things soo much simpler. Don (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldglite is now homeless
|
|
(...) I got the same message a while ago, if you reply and say that you'll behave they will reopen your account. Leonardo (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: (Some) Parts which are in the update-pipeline
|
|
(...) AFAIK steve this should go in update 2000-01, because the normal color #16 version is. (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Subparts for Black Falcon and Wolfpack Patterns ?
|
|
(...) So this means that even if I had redone the torsos then they would have been wrong? (...) AFAIK yes. (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldglite is now homeless
|
|
(...) Why don't you set up an account at (URL) ? KL (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | ldglite is now homeless
|
|
(...) Apparently the quick links to the latest zip files that I published in lugnet violated the geocities Terms Of Service by bypassing the homepage with the advertisements (or something like that). Oops! Don (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Help for povray needed!
|
|
(...) There are a couple of ways around this. One is to write all the POV-Ray commands to a .BAT file, using the START command with its /WAIT option. After compiling all the needed files, run the .BAT file. Another way is to launch POV-Ray, then put (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | (Some) Parts which are in the update-pipeline
|
|
As requested, here is a list of part-files which are in the queue for the 2000-02 update. These are files which were intended for 2000-01, but I either didn't have a chance to review them, or there was some hold-up in the process. Files which were (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: open source & inventory ?
|
|
unfortunately, both sites seem to be no longer available. :-( (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) Hmm. There's a couple of problems with your examples. In overdraw2.png, you are having the quad intersect the circle exactly at two vertices. If the quad was a bit narrower, you would need to split the two original triangles, retaining the (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Comments on parts up for vote- Pt 1
|
|
(...) No, it's a good thing to have a program to identify these things. Even though edges-only primitives can't be BFC'ed, I'm guessing there could be other advantages to avoiding singular matrices, and few disadvantages. Steve (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
|
(...) OK, that sounds reasonable -- it's something that a clean-up program could look for, even though it's not practical for a rendering program to do the same. Steve (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
(...) Whew! Only one of those files is mine! :\ (...) True. (...) I don't think that's necessary. If a subfile is not certified, then the renderer will not apply BFC processing to the subfile. Besides, if having all subfiles certified was a (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Smoke-Clear color code (was: Problem with 1-4con1.dat)
|
|
(...) I don't think there is a sanctioned color-code yet ... checking ... checking ... nope, nothing in the color table in the FAQ. Hear Ye! Hear Ye! Unless someone complains otherwise, the proper LDraw color-code for 'smoked-transparent', AKA (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: what is legos official view of ldraw?
|
|
(...) I'd say it would be ok even then, imo. (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Syntax error in official part 754.dat?
|
|
(...) There was a discussion about this awhile ago. Since LDraw will interpret these lines as subfile commands, the lines are syntactically correct. Badly formed, but not invalid. And 754.dat is getting fixed in the 2000-01 update! Steve (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Syntax error in official part 754.dat?
|
|
Hi, I just noticed that L3Lab interpreted the following lines as real lines, not as comments: 01 16 0 -2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ring3.dat 01 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ring3.dat I sent a mail to Lars to notify him of this small "bug", but then it (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Subparts for Black Falcon and Wolfpack Patterns ?
|
|
(...) errors. (...) common (...) these (...) let (...) Having now looked in more detail at the torsos, I will probably modify this proposal. On the torsos the _shield_ is a very different shape and scale to the shield part. The actual wolf and black (...) (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: what is legos official view of ldraw?
|
|
(...) I get ya. It is ok to make any lego part untill or unless TLG says otherwise. (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: the parts 754.dat and 756.dat in the 8.5L hose
|
|
(...) Thanks for clearing that up! In that case, I'll submit the 756.dat I just posted to lugnet.cad.dat.parts to Steve Bliss. Since it is an improvement of an existing part, it shouldn't require a vote, right? Fredrik (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: the parts 754.dat and 756.dat in the 8.5L hose
|
|
Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote in message news:qrd7lduwl4w.fsf....uio.no... (...) I updated the 754.dat to make it more realistic, but obviously failed to do so for 756. Feel free to improve the 756.dat! -John Van (24 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
