Subject:
|
Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 3 Apr 2000 00:01:01 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
rui.martins@STOPSPAMlink.pt
|
Viewed:
|
1726 times
|
| |
|
|
> Fifth and final in the series. Summary of the recap.
>
> This concludes my review of the "Line in the Sand" thread. If I have
> overlooked any issues, important or trivial, feel free to point them
> out. If there's something I didn't mention in this thread, one of the
> following applies:
>
> 1. I think the issue is settled
> 2. It wasn't brought up in the LITS thread.
> 3. I missed it.
>
> Whichever of the three applies, speak up now.
Well I have to congratulate you for the effort !
Has always, when asked to, you provide some nice output! ;)
So now let's discuss it.
Just reply to my previous replys to "LITS 2" mails.
I have to say, that I'don't actually have time know to reread the entire
"Line in the Sand" thread, but at least the points I was thinking about where
mentioned. I can't remember any missed, but for that I had to read the entire
thread, just to be sure, which I can't right now.
One of the most inportant topics I think is the Local/Global Clip state and
it's branch association (none/all BFC certified to actualy do BFC)
But I'll jsut wait for comments on my previous mail from everybody
interested in replying.
Once again, nice work
See ya
Rui Martins
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
| Fifth and final in the series. Summary of the recap. This concludes my review of the "Line in the Sand" thread. If I have overlooked any issues, important or trivial, feel free to point them out. If there's something I didn't mention in this thread, (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
