 | | Re: MPD spec
|
|
(...) Sorry to only get back now. I have the following questions: - Which (inline) file in the (.mpd) file is considered the root of the model - First (would be my obvious choice) ? - Last ? - we have to find out which ? The previous question raises (...) (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw extended colors
|
|
(...) I will have to find a way how to define such colors in MLCad but I think I will provide an option where the user can define if he/she likes 24bit or 12bit colors. Generally no problem :-) Michael (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw extended colors
|
|
I would if I could, but it's hard for me to imagine how this can be supported by LDS... /Tore (...) (25 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | LDraw extended colors
|
|
The LDraw colors are 0-15, 32-47, 256-511 (and of course 16 and 24). Paul Gyugyi defined some more colors for LDLite, 17-23, 25, 57 and "Direct Colors" in the range 0x04000000-0x07FFFFFF. As MLCad supports these colors, I'm going to add support for (...) (25 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: oops. i'm new at this
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Jonathan Gevaryahu writes: [snip] (...) Jonathan, make sure you understand how to use the predefined subparts, we also call them primitives. If the shape of the part you intend to do isn't too compicated, there is a lot to gain (...) (25 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts update
|
|
(...) I've been tied up lately, so I've been falling behind on checking parts into the process. I've got 86 files (new parts, fixed parts, subparts, and primitives) ready to be voted on. There are at least 60 more to look at before I can consider (...) (25 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST)
|
|
(...) It's looking good! (...) Model first, get part numbers later... :) Steve (25 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST)
|
|
(...) How about whining? Tooooooodd, will you pretty pretty please have someone make the samurai minifigs/armour/equipment for me, pwease!!! (Honestly, I can't be the only Lugnetter to like the Ninja (now called Samurai by me) theme)). *sighs* I'm (...) (25 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST)
|
|
----- Original Message ----- From: Kevin B <kevinb01@netfocus.net> To: <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2000 8:56 PM Subject: Re: Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST) (...) (URL) about that! Kevin B (25 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST)
|
|
----- Original Message ----- From: Jonathan Gevaryahu <Jgevaryahu@hotmail.com (remove)> To: <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2000 7:42 PM Subject: Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST) (...) Check this out: (URL) (...) (25 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Parts update
|
|
When is the next Parts update running? Is there a voting page up? T Burger (25 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST)
|
|
(...) Jonathan G: Take the above advice with a very large grain of salt. :-) Asking for parts to be made isn't actually a bad idea, inherently speaking. Since the entire L-CAD/LDraw parts effort is a spare-time endeavor for people, it all depends on (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: oops. i'm new at this
|
|
(...) No, your tone was fine. There is a *big* difference between ... [parts] which I would like to know the status of... and ... I need these parts made soon ... My preference for authoring is LDAO (with LDLite for real-time preview), but your (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: oops. i'm new at this
|
|
(...) Anybody are free to model any parts they feel like doing, but it is in their own interest to see if anybody else are working on the same part already. Without the part tracker working, I see no better solution than to post a query here. Also (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: oops. i'm new at this
|
|
oops. sorry if I insulted anyone. I intended no harm by that post. (i'm very new to this newsgroup, and i haven't yet found out what is looked down upon) uh, actually, if I could, *I* would like to try at modeling some of the parts on that list! I (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST)
|
|
(...) 4589.DAT ?? (...) I've started some design work - but its in the early stages (...) This is done as 3068p81 and submitted for the next voting (see (URL)#2549-1-01 Pirate Bridge (...) A mock-up was done recently bt Tore Eriksson (see (URL) (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST)
|
|
One other thing. In future, you should know that asking for parts to be made is not a good idea and most of the people here frown uopn it, especially for such a large list (I should know, I have had it happen to me numerous times) -- Jonathan Wilson (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST)
|
|
(...) That would be the cone 1` x 1 (...) Both awaiting voting (...) Also awaiting voting (...) If this is the hand axe, then no it is not done. The pickaxe has been done as has the small castle axe. The large castle axe also has not been done. (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Are any of these parts done/in progress (BIG POST)
|
|
I, an avid lego user in earlier years, was amazed to see the amount of progress and programs, particularly ldraw, that were created for lego use on computers. However, I couldn't help but notice that several of ldraw's parts are missing, and as the (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDS ver 0.29
|
|
(...) Ahh! Fantastic! Now, that was a great example, wasn't it? Best thing with it was that the "Eternal loop" error check works... :) Should of course be: i=1 while i<=5 gosub :hello i=i+1 wend end (25 years ago, 26-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
|
