Subject:
|
Re: Suggestion for interprocess communication
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 9 Feb 2000 17:26:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
791 times
|
| |
|
|
Michael Lachmann skrev i meddelandet ...
>
> Since Windows has a real drag & drop mechanism, which is realy easy to
> implement when using the MFC extensions of Microsoft, I suggest using this
> mechanism.
Sigh, I suppose it makes sense, using 'real' drag & drop, although I'm not
very keen on adding a ton of OLE into my program. Nor to think about
developing time...
Most MFC solutions are *massive* overkill for simple applications, but that is
not noticed, as all the DLL-s are included in the Windows installation anyway.
Just for the fun of it: What's 'unreal' about our current solution/suggestion?
Sorry for the language ranting.
--
Anders Isaksson, Sweden
BlockCAD: http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/proglego.htm
Gallery: http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/gallery.htm
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Suggestion for interprocess communication
|
| (...) I agree that it is more effort for none MFC applications. (...) Not realy, since if you want to make sure your program is working on all computers no matter whats installed you have to make a static build, which means your application get (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Suggestion for interprocess communication
|
| I talked to Anders Isakson about the drag & drop feature. Since he told me that nothing is fixed now, I would like to suggest another way of implementing the drag & drop feature: Since Windows has a real drag & drop mechanism, which is realy easy to (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
