Subject:
|
Re: Suggestion for interprocess communication
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sun, 13 Feb 2000 00:51:30 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
LPIENIAZEK@NOVERA.spamcakeCOM
|
Viewed:
|
716 times
|
| |
|
|
Anders Isaksson wrote:
> Just for the fun of it: What's 'unreal' about our current solution/suggestion?
It's not Windows standard?
I think it would be neat if I, for example, could use Notepad as a
source and destination.
--
Larry Pieniazek - lpieniazek@mercator.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
Note: this is a family forum!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Suggestion for interprocess communication
|
| Larry Pieniazek skrev i meddelandet <38A60012.2FE46FAC@v...er.net>... (...) solution/suggestion? (...) A 'Windows Standard' doesn't exist - it's a moving target :-) (...) Notepad doesn't work as a drop target (or drag source), it's just a simple (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Suggestion for interprocess communication
|
| Michael Lachmann skrev i meddelandet ... (...) Sigh, I suppose it makes sense, using 'real' drag & drop, although I'm not very keen on adding a ton of OLE into my program. Nor to think about developing time... Most MFC solutions are *massive* (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
