Subject:
|
Re: DAT format question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 22 Sep 1999 16:48:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
759 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message <37e9033a.13891366@lugnet.com>...
> Did you publish your class hierarchy? It would be interesting to see. It
> would make some sense to derive the specific types from a DAT-File base
> class. But maybe there really isn't enough difference between the
> file-types to bother.
Yup. The simplified one I made last night is here:
http://www.pcpros.net/~graywolf/legocad_objects.html
The over-complicated one isn't on the server anymore.
-Gary
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: DAT format question
|
| (...) Complexity also increases as over-specification increases. (...) Yes, polygons and lines should be allowed. Maybe that should be on the advanced interface, but it should be allowed. (...) Yes. (...) Exactly. And if you right-click an object, (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
