Subject:
|
Re: DAT format question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 21 Sep 1999 23:30:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
552 times
|
| |
|
|
Gary Williams wrote in message ...
> The only other alternative I can think of would to have sub-menus on the
> File/Open and File/New menus, one for each file type. Then it would be up
> to the user to tell the program what type of file he was about to work
with.
Doh', this wouldn't be a complete solution, either. If the user opens a
model, I'd still have to determine which external references in it are parts
and which are embedded models/subassemblies. And if the user opens a part,
I'll have to determine which external references in it are sub-parts and
which are primitives.
I wonder how the other packages resolve this issue.
(I apologize if anyone out there considers my numerous recent posts to be
spammy.)
-Gary
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: DAT format question
|
| Would it be too restrictive of my CAD program to require that all parts (and nothing but parts) are stored in the parts and parts/s directories, and all primitives (and nothing but primitives) are stored in the p directory? Models could exist (...) (25 years ago, 21-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: DAT format question
|
| My original plans called for my CAD package to distinguish among the various kinds of DAT file. This would allow the program to know when it was appropriate to enable certain editing features. For example, it shouldn't allow the user to add (...) (25 years ago, 21-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
