Subject:
|
Re: DAT format question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 21 Sep 1999 23:59:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
493 times
|
| |
|
|
Would it be too restrictive of my CAD program to require that all parts (and
nothing but parts) are stored in the parts and parts/s directories, and all
primitives (and nothing but primitives) are stored in the p directory?
Models could exist anywhere, and a model's submodels could exist in either
the models directory or the directory where the model was opened from.
There would be absolutely no other directory-searching as is currently
allowed by other software.
This seems like the most elegant solution.
-Gary
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: DAT format question
|
| (...) Probably too restrictive. Most (I think) part developers design their parts in the models directory to keep them separate from the official parts. Mock-ups and crude outlines of parts should also be kept out of the parts directory. I like the (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: DAT format question
|
| Gary Williams: (...) This makes sense for the editor, but the renderer should consider any LDraw file equal wherever it resides. It it also worth remembering that some parts files actually uses specific colours (not only 16 and 24). Play well, Jacob (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: DAT format question
|
| Gary Williams wrote in message ... (...) with. Doh', this wouldn't be a complete solution, either. If the user opens a model, I'd still have to determine which external references in it are parts and which are embedded models/subassemblies. And if (...) (25 years ago, 21-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
