 | | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
(...) tag? (...) You might be right about this one. It's a small part with rather oddly rounded surfaces. I'll take another look at it. (...) OK, and I'll also implement the use of sub-parts to separate the front face. If anyone has the triangle (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
Wow. I at least keep Lego around the house so I can tell myself I play with Ldraw to make records of my son's and my creations :-) A suggestion: if there is a difficult pattern or part you want to work on, ask around here for someone willing to loan (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
Chris Dee wrote in message ... (...) (425p01) (...) do (...) redefine (...) with, (...) An example: Adding a white rectangle to a color 16 surface: 1. Delete the color 16 surface from the part. 2. Add the white rectangle. 3. Fill in the area around (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: My proposal for the orientation of new elements
|
|
(...) I believe that all bricks, tiles, plates, and all parts with studs on top have y=0 just below the studs and above the "body"? /Lars (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: My proposal for the orientation of new elements
|
|
(...) We already have a convention for this, I think. Parts with studs should have the top of the part (excluding the studs) in the X-Z-plane, and otherwise be centered. Of course, special parts need special rules. An example is the "joystick" (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
(...) It seems to be molded as two parts which have been glued or welded. I'm not going to pry mine apart to find a second number. If there is a different official number for this part, our standard would be to use that number.[1] (...) You mean the (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: My proposal for the orientation of new elements
|
|
On Wed, 24 Feb 1999 04:45:26 GMT, "onyx" <onyx@flash.net> wrote: [big snip] Good stuff, onyx. One further thought on wheels/tires: the Z-positioning should facilitate placing the wheel on axles. For most wheels, this is no big deal, the edge of the (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
Hello all, (...) Terry replied: (...) I second Terry´s remark, on my computer I loose about 80% of the green and white stripes when it renders the baseplates 606p33, 608p33 and 425p01. Chris Dee wrote: (...) Yes, I´m one of those. At home I have no (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
Terry K wrote in message <36d3bf77.1968270@lu...et.com>... (...) server (...) votes (...) Terry, I voted yesterday and got a message about some changes going on there. It said something about a 48 hour delay, I think. Sorry I didn't read it that (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
(...) I searched all parts here and couldn't find any that uses the box3#8 primitive. Where it is used ? Leonardo (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
i do not accually own any lego. i am excusivly ldraw. (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Suggestions for JJM
|
|
(...) Sorry for that. I did make that the wrong color, didn't I? -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
(...) Jonathan, please reconsider. Perfecting your pattern skills on the existing parts would serve you well in making new parts. And keep in mind that the new parts you make should very closely match the actual physical part you are modeling. The (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
(...) You bet it does. (...) See above. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
(...) How many of you have voted? I am having trouble with the CGI program server and wonder if any of you have had trouble. And I have not received any votes in the mail yet. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
(...) Do you think it is really required to inline it? I was under the impression that the next release of ldlite would address the 3#8 problem. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
check out belvill set 5845. the jetski has a part that has a pink body and light pink triangles. (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | My proposal for the orientation of new elements
|
|
My proposal for the standard orientation of all new elements being added to the parts catalog. LEdit/LDraw have a "standard" or "default" view that looks upon models/elements from the upper front left. The LEdit/LDraw axes are as follows in the (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
(...) Wait, isn't pink one of the 16 defined LDraw colors? I t doesn't need to be dithered. From ldraw.doc: ... 9 Light Blue 10 Light Green 11 Cyan 12 Light Red 13 Pink <-- LDraw color #13 14 Yellow 15 White ... Or is this pink a different shade (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT voting page up
|
|
regarding the patterns... i have no immediate plans to fix them as i am going to be making more new parts... ___...___ Get your free web-based email at (URL) OFFER: 250 Web Site Templates, Only $29.95! - (URL) (26 years ago, 23-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
