Subject:
|
Re: My proposal for the orientation of new elements
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Feb 1999 13:55:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
994 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 24 Feb 1999 04:45:26 GMT, "onyx" <onyx@flash.net> wrote:
[big snip]
Good stuff, onyx. One further thought on wheels/tires: the
Z-positioning should facilitate placing the wheel on axles. For most
wheels, this is no big deal, the edge of the wheel meets the edge of the
brick. But for some wheels/tires, the joining-part is inside the hub.
The space tires are an example of this (well, the medium space tire
is--I don't know about the others).
Also, for any new part, conformance to the orientation and positioning
of existing part(s) should be given weight. If the existing parts are
wacky enough, we should consider breaking with the precedent, and
following the 'face front' standard. Fixing the existing part(s) in a
later update is possible, but it causes problems with models which use
those pieces.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | My proposal for the orientation of new elements
|
| My proposal for the standard orientation of all new elements being added to the parts catalog. LEdit/LDraw have a "standard" or "default" view that looks upon models/elements from the upper front left. The LEdit/LDraw axes are as follows in the (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
