Subject:
|
Re: My proposal for the orientation of new elements
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Feb 1999 18:10:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1127 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 24 Feb 1999 14:14:57 GMT, Fredrik Glöckner
<fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote:
> I don't think it makes sense to rotate existing parts to make the
> conform. This would cause too many problems with existing models, I
> fear.
Correcting positioning and rotational errors can be done when/if a part
renumbered. Which doesn't really happen all that often (it just seems
like it).
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: My proposal for the orientation of new elements
|
| (...) We already have a convention for this, I think. Parts with studs should have the top of the part (excluding the studs) in the X-Z-plane, and otherwise be centered. Of course, special parts need special rules. An example is the "joystick" (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
