Subject:
|
Re: why is no-one saying anything about my parts?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 30 Jul 1999 16:09:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
754 times
|
| |
| |
Jonathan, maybe we do need to try and respect your current
attempts,
but please try and follow some simple standards. I think that
these are
the biggest things that got people mad at you for
1. Don't post gobs of messages of .dats. If you just focus on
one piece
at a time this problem would be eliminated
2. Don't demand or insistently ask for pieces to be made.
3. Don't ask 'What is wrong with this part', ask 'This is what I
know needs
to be fixed, how do I do it'. This type of question will be
more respected.
4. Please, Please, Please use correct Capitalization. There are
at least 40
words in the below message that should have been
capitalized.
5. Check your spelling, there are at least 5 misspelled words,
better than
other of your messages. Many Email programs have a spell
check, try
using it. I don't always, but I check my messages for
careless mistakes
like yours. If you don't know how a word is spelled, just
let us know by
adding (sp) to it.
6. Use a signature, be courteous.
Please at least try following these. I think that it would
really improve people's
image of you.
Ryan
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 7/30/99, at 1:16 AM, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> every part in the current voting batch is made with the real piece in hand. (this
> also applies to parts not in the vote but posted to cad.dat.parts recently such as
> the wheel hard plastic large)
> every part has been checked by me before submission/posting. what i needd people
> to do is look at the part and tell me if for example i am using the wrong
> primitive or missing edge lines where there should be some etc. i have checked the
> parts and made sure that as a representation of the part they are as close as it
> is possible to get in ldraw but i am not magic. i do not know everything there is
> to know about ldraw parts making. there are people out there (steve bliss for one
> but there are others) who have been making ldraw parts for a while now and know
> things like whether an edge line is required there.
> also there may be mistakes in the part that i missed when checking the part. i
> wend over the parts with a fine tooth comb but threre is probobly someone out
> there who can go over them with an even finer tooth comb.i have checked every part
> against the real thing and found nothing wrong with the parts (except for a few
> things like the edges of the raised baseplate but i pointed those out to people
> when i put them on cad.dat.parts and no-one said that i would need to do them to
> get in. people said i did not need the edges on the baseplate or the inside of the
> battery box.). that does not mean that there is nothing wrong with then, it just
> means that i cant find anything wrong with them. i am not the only person to ever
> make a part that has been checked over by the author and found by them to be
> correct and someone else later finds a mistake. none of the parts is not sutible
> for use in ldraw models and pov-ray renderings.
> all i am asking is that you give me a chance. it took me a lot of effort to get my
> hands on these parts to model and i genuinly want to contribute something back to
> the community. i porimise not to ask for amy more parts or help on the newsgroup.
>
> i notice that the greatest vioce agazinst me has come from people like tim
> coutrney who have never made a part and who do not know how hard it can be for a
> beginner like myself. do you think that people like steve bliss and chris dee made
> parts that were perfect back when they were learning?
>
> look at the example fo the aquanauts patterned tile that was posted several times
> by someone who wanted to get it perfect.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: why is no-one saying anything about my parts?
|
| every part in the current voting batch is made with the real piece in hand. (this also applies to parts not in the vote but posted to cad.dat.parts recently such as the wheel hard plastic large) every part has been checked by me before (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|