Subject:
|
(Was: "~moved to" files)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 30 Apr 1999 10:22:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
798 times
|
| |
|
|
I have not followed this thread so carefully (either) but I think if we ever move
wheel- or tyre file, we should use one x~z direction, prefarably the current most
commonly used. I find it quite frustration that wheels don't point the same way.
Or maybe we should change the files in the outnumbered direction at once?
/Tore
Terry K wrote:
>
> While an interestion conjecture, I think if you want to play with the parts
> updater, why not add file recursion and/or entire directory handling?
>
> :-)
>
> -- Terry K --
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
|
| (...) Ah..... Now I see your point. That would be a valuable feature, if we moved a part slightly using the ~moved to file. And it would have no affect on a part that has not been re-positioned in the ~moved to file. While an interestion conjecture, (...) (25 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
