Subject:
|
Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 23 Apr 1999 18:41:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
629 times
|
| |
|
|
I agree, but shouldn't we have a separate moved-to.lst file?
/Tore
Adviesbureau Noord/Zuidlijn wrote:
> -----Original message-----
> From: Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com>
> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com>
> Date: donderdag 22 april 1999 2:43
> Subject: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
>
> > I was thinking that it might be a good idea to have MKLIST.exe ignore all
> > "~moved to" files by default. That would remove all those extraneous
> > listings from LEdit's parts.lst file. Resulting (hopefully) in less usage
> > of those parts in new models.
>
> > What do you think? Have MKLIST ingore them by default? With an optional
> > switch to show them if users wish to?
>
> I agree.
>
> Greetings, M. Moolhuysen.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
|
| (...) We could. If Steve and Lars would be willing to code their respective list programs to do so. I am not sure of the need or utility of having it, though. Any thoughts on what it would be useful for? AFAIK, LDraw, LDLite, and LDAO's Part Updater (...) (25 years ago, 24-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
|
| -----Original message----- From: Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: donderdag 22 april 1999 2:43 Subject: "~moved to" files and parts.lst (...) I agree. Greetings, M. Moolhuysen. (25 years ago, 23-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
