To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 1504
1503  |  1505
Subject: 
Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Sat, 24 Apr 1999 02:01:00 GMT
Viewed: 
723 times
  
On Fri, 23 Apr 1999 18:41:51 GMT, Tore Eriksson
<tore.eriksson@mbox325.swipnet.se> wrote:

I agree, but shouldn't we have a separate moved-to.lst file?

/Tore

We could.  If Steve and Lars would be willing to code their respective list
programs to do so.   I am not sure of the need or utility of having it, though.
Any thoughts on what it would be useful for?

AFAIK, LDraw, LDLite, and LDAO's Part Updater don't have any dependancies on
having ~moved to files being in the parts.lst file.  They depend on the actual
~moved to files themselves for the data they need.

-- Terry K --

Adviesbureau Noord/Zuidlijn wrote:

-----Original message-----
From: Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com>
To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com>
Date: donderdag 22 april 1999 2:43
Subject: "~moved to" files and parts.lst

I was thinking that it might be a good idea to have MKLIST.exe ignore all
"~moved to" files by default.  That would remove all those extraneous
listings from LEdit's parts.lst file.  Resulting (hopefully) in less usage
of those parts in new models.

What do you think?  Have MKLIST ingore them by default?  With an optional
switch to show them if users wish to?

I agree.

Greetings, M. Moolhuysen.




Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
 
(...) Oo. That one gets a big "I don't remember" from me. I am in the middle of re-writing the way LDAO checks & maintains parts.lst & the VEC, so I could easily add some extra code for a moved-to list. Steve (26 years ago, 24-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
  Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
 
(...) I double-checked this, and what Terry says is true for LDAO. Which is good. The bad news is that LDAO simply replaces the old part number with the new part number. It should be doing an inline operation. Steve (26 years ago, 26-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
 
I agree, but shouldn't we have a separate moved-to.lst file? /Tore (...) (26 years ago, 23-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

11 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR