Subject:
|
Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 30 Apr 1999 07:03:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2262 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Apr 1999 13:35:15 GMT, blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Apr 1999 06:17:08 GMT, legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K) wrote:
>
> > Now tell me what I am misunderstanding.
>
> Part #30079 is mis-positioned. It is not aligned for easy placement. I
> don't remember the exact numbers, maybe you have to move the piece up by
> -3LDU to 'click' it into a model, I don't remember. There was discussion
> about correcting the part, but it was decided that fixing would mess up any
> existing models, and so the part shouldn't be changed. But if the part
> number were to ever change (extremely unlikely, I'll admit), the new
> part-file could be corrected, and the ~Moved to shortcut could offset the
> new part to mimic the old part. But when people updated their models, LDAO
> would ignore the positioning information in the ~Moved to shortcut, and
> mis-position the part.
>
> Admittedly, this is a far-fetched example, since nothing is likely to
> happen with that particular part-file. But it shows that there are
> reasonable cases where the ~Moved to shortcut might not be a simple
>
> 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
>
> format.
>
> Steve
Ah..... Now I see your point. That would be a valuable feature, if we moved a
part slightly using the ~moved to file. And it would have no affect on a part
that has not been re-positioned in the ~moved to file.
While an interestion conjecture, I think if you want to play with the parts
updater, why not add file recursion and/or entire directory handling?
:-)
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | (Was: "~moved to" files)
|
| I have not followed this thread so carefully (either) but I think if we ever move wheel- or tyre file, we should use one x~z direction, prefarably the current most commonly used. I find it quite frustration that wheels don't point the same way. Or (...) (28 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst [DAT]
|
| (...) Part #30079 is mis-positioned. It is not aligned for easy placement. I don't remember the exact numbers, maybe you have to move the piece up by -3LDU to 'click' it into a model, I don't remember. There was discussion about correcting the part, (...) (28 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
