Subject:
|
Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 27 Apr 1999 09:44:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
705 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 26 Apr 1999 12:49:50 GMT, blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Apr 1999 02:01:00 GMT, legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K) wrote:
>
> > AFAIK, LDraw, LDLite, and LDAO's Part Updater don't have any dependancies on
> > having ~moved to files being in the parts.lst file. They depend on the actual
> > ~moved to files themselves for the data they need.
>
> I double-checked this, and what Terry says is true for LDAO. Which is
> good.
(whew!) Glad my assumption was correct. :-)
> The bad news is that LDAO simply replaces the old part number with the new
> part number. It should be doing an inline operation.
Huh? What do you mean by inline operation?
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst [DAT]
|
| (...) If part 1234.dat was ~Moved to 5678.dat, when LDAO updates 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1234.dat it shouldn't just cut out the 1234 and paste in 5678. It should inline this line (skipping any comment lines, of course). This would have the (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
|
| (...) I double-checked this, and what Terry says is true for LDAO. Which is good. The bad news is that LDAO simply replaces the old part number with the new part number. It should be doing an inline operation. Steve (25 years ago, 26-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
