Subject:
|
Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sat, 24 Apr 1999 13:21:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
605 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 24 Apr 1999 02:01:00 GMT, legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K) wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Apr 1999 18:41:51 GMT, Tore Eriksson
> <tore.eriksson@mbox325.swipnet.se> wrote:
>
> > I agree, but shouldn't we have a separate moved-to.lst file?
> >
> > /Tore
>
> We could. If Steve and Lars would be willing to code their respective list
> programs to do so. I am not sure of the need or utility of having it, though.
> Any thoughts on what it would be useful for?
>
> AFAIK, LDraw, LDLite, and LDAO's Part Updater don't have any dependancies on
> having ~moved to files being in the parts.lst file. They depend on the actual
> ~moved to files themselves for the data they need.
Oo. That one gets a big "I don't remember" from me.
I am in the middle of re-writing the way LDAO checks & maintains parts.lst
& the VEC, so I could easily add some extra code for a moved-to list.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
|
| (...) We could. If Steve and Lars would be willing to code their respective list programs to do so. I am not sure of the need or utility of having it, though. Any thoughts on what it would be useful for? AFAIK, LDraw, LDLite, and LDAO's Part Updater (...) (25 years ago, 24-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
