 | | Re: fixed part: JW's parts —Tim Courtney
|
| | | (...) What a revelation! (...) Then why do you push work you have done using 3d coordinate geometry when you know you are lousy at it and know you spit out crap? (...) most of (...) small (...) from (...) MY (...) I do not make parts myself. But the (...) (26 years ago, 10-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: fixed part: JW's parts —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | 1.what is wrong with my road curves? i am now making the curves with a sufficient number of segments to make them look good. (24 and 32). 2.i did some checking and the roadplate parts i posted posted to cad.dat are most definatly not the versions i (...) (26 years ago, 10-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: fixed part: JW's parts —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | | | (...) I've had similar problems myself with cad.dat. However, I always check to make sure that the file in cad.dat shows up the same as the one in my models folder. I suggest that you do the same, especially before asking which studs are missing. (...) (26 years ago, 10-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: fixed part: JW's parts —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) I think the problem Bram was having was related to some very odd SMTP e-mail problem -- that's the only place we saw it, other than JosephG's and BenV's problems, which were related to a buffer overflow[1]. But if there are still any problems (...) (26 years ago, 10-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: fixed part: JW's parts —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | | swuid cache is the proxy server that they have at my internet connection (murdoch university). i pulled the roadplate files off cad.dat yesterday and they are most definatly not the same roadplates i currently have in my parts folder. (26 years ago, 10-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: fixed part: JW's parts —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Hmm, well, that's bad. (Not the proxy server, but the chopped file.) I'm sorry that the upload feature is giving you these problems. Would you mind helping me narrow down the problem? [This offer is open to anyone who has had trouble posting a (...) (26 years ago, 11-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | (canceled) —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: fixed part: JW's parts —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | | 1. it said dat content not accepted not group does not exist. 2. i chose the largest dat file i could find, the floating astronaut picture at 200k (26 years ago, 11-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: fixed part: JW's parts —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | one last thing. are you people trying to tell me that my parts can't be made up to scratch, no matter how much fixing i do? (26 years ago, 10-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: fixed part: JW's parts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) I would not tell anyone anything like that. The question really isn't whether or not the *parts* can be improved. A better question would be: are you able to improve them? Part of the answer to that depends on your ability to work as part of (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
