Subject:
|
Re: LPub 4 Status
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 May 2008 02:15:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
16936 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Don Heyse wrote:
> Hmmm, I guess that's slightly different from the GMA X3100, which
> seemed to work for me. If you get a chance, try and run it with
> -n4 on the command line. That should render everything in the back
> buffer like 99.99% of the opengl programs out there.
The -n4 didn't have any noticeable effect. What exactly does n4 mean. I know
it means "draw to back buffer", but what does the n and the 4 mean?
--Travis
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LPub 4 Status
|
| (...) Arrgh, that's not good. It worked for me whenever I had a problem like that. I guess I'll have to use the OSX flush function. Are you by chance using partially transparent windows, or something fancy like that? (...) It's hooked to an ldlite (...) (17 years ago, 1-May-08, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LPub 4 Status
|
| (...) Hmmm, I guess that's slightly different from the GMA X3100, which seemed to work for me. If you get a chance, try and run it with -n4 on the command line. That should render everything in the back buffer like 99.99% of the opengl programs out (...) (17 years ago, 30-Apr-08, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
81 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
