Subject:
|
Re: LPub 4 Status
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:05:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9464 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad.dev, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> > > In lugnet.cad.dev, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> > > > In lugnet.cad.dev, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> > > > > One new metacommand
> > > > >
> > > > > 0 !LPUB RESOLUTION <value> (DPI|DPM|DPMM)
> > > > >
> > > > > defines the resolution.
> > > >
> > > > Shouldn't that be:
> > > >
> > > > 0 !LPUB RESOLUTION <value> (DPI|DPCM)
I agree. It was inconsistent. I've provided DPM, DPCM, DPMM, and the values
specified in meta commands are scaled appropriately.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LPub 4 Status
|
| (...) DPCM might be enough: Photoshop (which can be considered as a reference...) only has DPI and DPCM. Philo (17 years ago, 9-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LPub 4 Status
|
| (...) I'm actually can provide all of the above and to the math, I just don't want to have units expressed in individual meta commands. I ony want one unit and to have it expressed in the resolution meta command. So I could even have DPDM..... (...) (17 years ago, 7-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
81 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
