Subject:
|
Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 18:06:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2300 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Willy Tschager wrote:
> > hi lars,
> >
> > looks like L3P doesn't distinguish between part-files (.dat) and scene-files¬
> > (.ldr) when I use LGEO parts.¬ ¬
> > have a look at the following pic. when I render a .mpd (which containes the¬
> > subfile 926.ldr refering to the sets number) without LGEO I get a fine¬
> > result:¬ ¬ <<http://www.holly-wood.it/tmp/l3p-bug_without_lgeo.jpg>>¬
> > ¬
> > using LGEO-parts L3P substitutes the subfile 926.ldr with part¬ "32014 -
> > Technic Angle Connector #6" 'cos "lg_ _0926.inc" has an inbuild¬ move-to
> > command (lg_ _0926 moved to lg_ _32014) to the Technic¬ Angle Connector #6: ¬
> > <<http://www.holly-wood.it/tmp/l3p-bug_with_lgeo.jpg>>¬ ¬
> > you can download the related .mpd and .pov from:¬
> > ¬
> > <http://www.holly-wood.it/tmp/l3p-bug.zip>¬
> > ¬
> > I'm well aware that LGEO gets more and more outdated, but because of the¬
> > fantastic quality of the parts I'd like to stick to them as long as I can.
> > it¬ would be great if L3P could distinguish between .dat and .ldr ... and
> > use¬ anton raves parts for those not available in LGEO ;-)¬ ¬ bye, w.¬
>
> Yes, I would be great.
>
> But while it doesn't distinguish, we have to deal with it. I think the naming
> convention we had had before the .ldr extension, with officicial models named
> m926.dat and so on, solves this problem. So I suggest you name it m926.ldr as a
> workaround. This could be a good habit even if L3P is improved to make the
> distinction.
this is what I did in the end. nontheless I consider this a bug worth reporting
and subsequently sort out the ldr-dat mess we are currently in ;-)
w.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
| (...) Yes, I would be great. But while it doesn't distinguish, we have to deal with it. I think the naming convention we had had before the .ldr extension, with officicial models named m926.dat and so on, solves this problem. So I suggest you name (...) (19 years ago, 15-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
