 | | robot head wanted
|
|
now that the head has been fixed is anyone planing to finish ldrawing the robot (points finger at chris dee) by making the robot head? (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | my page
|
|
check out my page at (URL) contains .dat files of every ice planet 2002 set (only thing missing is the minifigs and decorated elements), .dat files of some castle MOCS including warwick castle, a large MOC castle, the intercity and metropoitin (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: parts DESPERATLY wanted (steve: please read)
|
|
any chance i can please have this program? (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars Elements
|
|
(...) Even better. Is it possible for one or more of the utilities to be able to associate 2 or more descriptive names with any given part? (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars Elements
|
|
(...) I guess that takes care of the percentage of people who want to use the two parts in this fairly limited SW way. But what about the other people who never really cared about the SW "use" of the elements - should they be forced to remember that (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Complete list of metacommands?
|
|
(...) Umm, *anything* is allowed at the moment, since these meta-statements aren't used anywhere. But I'd suggest new parts should use the first word of their descriptive name as the first entry for 0 CATEGORY. Or at least that the category entry (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars Elements
|
|
(...) I think it's highly unlikely that this new element won't show up in other places completely unrelated to SW and light sabres, and it probably will even show up in opaque colors. IMHO, calling this element a light sabre blade is like calling (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDlite "Black" not really Black...
|
|
(...) Yeah, basically me 2. I think I still have some images around with black-sided studs. I didn't remember about the transparent pieces. Steve (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars Elements
|
|
(...) Or improve one or more pieces of software to keep track of pieces like this. Steve (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Complete list of metacommands?
|
|
What is LDS (sorry if I am being obtuse)? Also what is the exact behavior of INCLUDE? I assume the line will look like: 0 INCLUDE /include/file/path And if I remember correctly all the parts in the file are loaded into memory for use but not drawn. (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Studs
|
|
Hi :-) I thought a bit about all this stud talk and reached a conclusion: is not worth the effort. I mean, nobody includes a touch sensor in it's model, in this case a transparent touch sensor, if does not intend to use it. And if you want to use (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDlite "Black" not really Black...
|
|
(...) I tried that already, and it looks kind of strange, especially for transparent parts. For some reason, it just doesn't seem to look like the real instructions (IMO). Maybe I'm just too used to the default LDraw look...especially because the (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars Elements
|
|
(...) Maybe this is one place where using a short-cut file would make sense. WE could place the actual file (XXXX.DAT) in the Bar category, and then name the SW version (which would just call the Bar file) XXXXA.DAT. --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Studs
|
|
(...) I guess I'm not a a standard user. :-) To me the objective should be to accurately represent the real world, not to copy the LEGO instructions. (...) My point of view also disagrees here. Studs of real transparent parts are hollow, at least in (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Complete list of metacommands?
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: maandag 29 maart 1999 16:55 Subject: Re: Complete list of metacommands? (...) Steve, could you supply us with a (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Default extensions
|
|
Is anyone else bugged by the DAT extension? Does anyone else use other extensions for various flavors of (near-)LDraw source files? I stick with DAT for vanilla LDraw files. For other files files, I've been using: LDL - LDLite extensions (especially (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars Elements
|
|
(...) the (...) At least "Star Wars people" would not have to go looking for it. Someone using the part who is unfamiliar with Star Wars sets might never think to look for it there. That's the basic problem with theme-based nomenclature. It makes (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
|
|
(...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars Elements
|
|
(...) blade (...) to (...) I would disagree with you here, Steve, and agree with Jonathan on this one. For this purpose it should be next to the hilt so people don't have to go searching for it. Keep Building!! -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Complete list of metacommands?
|
|
(...) These two comment meta-commands are not currently recognized by any programs, AFAIK. They are both part-file meta-commands, intended for use by part-search and part-catalog programs. CATEGORY specifies the part's category. I think all the (...) (26 years ago, 29-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
