 | | ldraw.org MOTM & SOTM Voting for December 2001
|
|
Just a reminder... Voting for the Model/Scene of the Month now commences promptly on the first of each month and runs through to the end of the month. So it is there and waiting now at: (URL) Terry K -- (23 years ago, 2-Dec-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | ldraw.org's MOTM & SOTM Winners for November 2001
|
|
Hi All, Time to announce the winners for November... MOTM: Joseph Gonzalez for his "Shinkitsune" mech. SOTM: Cale Leiphart for "A Garden Tour". Congratulations to both for a job well done. And see both the winners at: (URL) don't forget, with the (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !
|
| |
| | Re: Small bug in certified part 30187 Bike 3 Wheel Motorcycle Body Upper
|
|
(...) I'm sorry, but, I have reviewed the lines indicated, and the suggested fix will not be made. The parts align the way they are. Changing those two lines would make about 10 other lines need to be changed. No change being made. Paul (23 years ago, 1-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting Reviewers (was: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News))
|
|
(...) I would not agree to it, I get too much junk mail as it is. :) (...) I was think along this line as well. If the tracker keeps "track" of who submitted the part file, it could email the comments directly to the submitter. - or - A check box (...) (23 years ago, 1-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
(...) No big deal - no harm done, and it got recertified in time. I just thought it was funny - I didn't think anyone would do anything in the short time I was working. Steve (23 years ago, 1-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
(...) Whoops - sorry !! Chris (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | [Parts Tracker] Closed for the Weekend
|
|
I've shut down the Parts Tracker for awhile. You can still look at the data, and get files, but no one can submit parts or post reviews. I expect it will be closed down for most of the weekend, while I finalize LDraw.org Part Update 2001-02. Have a (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Errors in certified part 30212 Support Insectoid Leg Large [DAT]
|
|
This part is made of crumbs. Numerous crumbs created by stl2dat. The 2 errors I have found are on the foot. the opposite quad of this quad 4 16 -18.58 16 -92.6 -18.58 12 -92.6 -17.45 12 -90.2 -17.45 16 -90.2 is absent. there is a small gap between (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting Reviewers (was: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News))
|
|
(...) One way to get around the publishing emails problem is to provide a link against each vote / comment, which brings up a screen with a message field. When you submit the form, it sends email to the chosen reviewer, with subject "re: LDraw parts (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
(...) You posted it right when I was in the middle of prepping the release! :p So, if someone could look over Chris's file, and post a review of go or no-go, that'd be awesome. Steve (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Damien Guichard writes: <snip> (...) This part now corrected and re-posted to the Parts Tracker. Chris (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
(...) I agree - I'd rather fix the parts I've submitted - so dont be afraid of pointing out small errors. Chris (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldglite 0.9.4
|
|
(...) Ok I built it and it works. I guess my notes in makefile.linux were incoherent. To build for Mesa versions older than 4.0 you only need to comment out the OFFSCREEN_LIBS line. I guess the Mesa folks broke OSMesa out into a separate library at (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Small bug in certified part 30187 Bike 3 Wheel Motorcycle Body Upper [DAT]
|
|
The imperfection appears below mudguards: this triangle 3 16 20 4 -18 20 .938 -25.391 20 4.308 -26.97 should be 3 16 20 4 -18 20 .938 -25.391 20 4 -26.97 and this triangle 3 16 -20 4.308 -26.97 -20 .938 -25.391 -20 4 -18 should be 3 16 -20 4 -26.97 (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ldglite 0.9.4
|
|
(...) If off-screen rendering is disabled, everything seems to work fine. (...) I think it is 3.4. (...) I have extended the installation instructions, so they (should) handle this problem. (...) Yes "/etc/ld.so.conf" and "ldconfig". (...) (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [Parts Tracker] Daily News
|
|
(...) To expand a little on Dan's reply... The updates to Partsref and Peeron don't happen automatically. They are separate processes, and both require work from the people involved. So they can take a few days (or so...) Also, 2001-01 was the first (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting Reviewers (was: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News))
|
|
(...) I personally don't mind, but I wouldn't want to speak for anyone else. (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting Reviewers (was: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News))
|
|
(...) Not at this time. It's been brought up that perhaps the list of reviewers should be made public (although I'm not so sure about publishing their email addresses). Would everyone agree that a list of the names of reviewers should be put up on (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
(...) I'll second that! Steve (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Errors in certified parts (was [Parts Tracker] Daily News)
|
|
(...) Yes, I agree. For now, you just have to remember to mark the vote the same as your prior vote. Ideally, there should be a comment area when a new file is submitted, and a separate post-a-comment function. (...) Nod. And we should be able to (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
