 | | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
|
(...) So would I (personally). (...) Me too. In fact, I would take a stronger position against clone bricks than against purely-MOC bricks. This isn't to suggest that every official TLG element is a fragrant flower, but IMHO all clone elements are (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New newsgroup lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
(...) The ml isn't currently gatewayed with the ng. A gateway could always be established, however, if the need arose. (...) It is (or at least was a few minutes ago) when you sent out your other message. --Todd (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
|
(...) You did a good job of it, though I don't think you'll like the replies from people (personal prediction). (...) I would personally severely disapprove. Though it could be argued to include clone bricks (which your described part would fall (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New newsgroup lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
We're not gatewayed, right? That is, I got a message from L-CAD@LISTSERV.UH.EDU that I replied to and I went to the people still subscribed to the list, but it did not appear here. That's what I expected would happen if we weren't gatewayed. (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Non-TLG Parts
|
|
I'm not sure how the best way to broach this subject, but to jump head first best. First, I have wondered how the community feels about the creation of non-standard parts. By this I mean parts that TLG has not created ( at least not to my knowledge (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New newsgroup lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
But can we set the l.c.d for a Digest? I preferred the LCAD list in Digest form, this Live Feed is driving me nuts. I already get 100+ emails/day at home, and 3-900/day at work. (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal for Revised Memorial
|
|
(...) have (...) Would this be visible to a visitor accessing ldraw.org? It would be very nice if the URL in the text box on a browser stayed at ldraw.org instead of making the visitor think thye had the wrong address. --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw announcements/updates
|
|
(...) For the site discussion, I think a temporary (or permanent if you desire) group name would be most appropriately: lugnet.cad.dev.site, denoting the site for the .dev group.. (...) Whoa! If I had $$ I would probably use that group too.. Keep (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Subgroup for Revamp?
|
|
(...) I like the idea of a short-term newsgrouping experiment, but since the discussions would be centered around a permanently evolving resource, maybe the experiment would work better with a transient resource, project, or event instead. In other (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | LDraw announcements/updates
|
|
(...) If a separate mailing list were set up for update notifications, then everything would have to be posted to two places (there and here). Another possibility: Simply create .cad.announce or .cad.updates for this purpose. That way anyone could (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal for Revised Memorial
|
|
(...) Um, then pair.com is a better choice than Osiris. Mike-friendly modeler.. what's wrong with Ldraw? :) (...) Good ideas.. A model competition isn't a bad idea, with a set as a prize or credit in Auczilla..something like that (the $$ for the (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Subgroup for Revamp?
|
|
(...) Probably good, so we can weed out general ldraw discussion from site discussion. I see the Re: proposal.. thread has been chopped up into the set/piece discussion too..that would help on that as well. lugnet.cad.dev.site? Keep Building!! -Tim (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal for Revised Memorial
|
|
(...) My final version shouldn't take more than that because the bulk of that is program downloads. The website shouldn't be more than 500k at the most.. sites are small.. Maybe to be safe we can be allotted 15mb? Keep Building!! -Tim <>< (URL) (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Organizing the Site Revamp
|
|
(...) Yeah, or major subidrectories. They can be put into: /download/ /gettingstarted (too long/cumbersome?) /tlg/ /links/ /contribute/ /credits/ /memorial/ (...) Probably. (...) Oops <blush> Thanks for the reminder, we can't forget who got us (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New newsgroup lugnet.cad.dev
|
|
Hi, one of the lurkers here. Todd, is there any form of digest mode for any of the newsgroups? If not, is there one in the planning stages? If so, I would be one to use it, since i do all my mailing lists that way. -Doug G (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Double-mailings -- notice, apology, and fix
|
|
[Followups set to lugnet.admin.general] Whoops -- my apologies if you have received a few double-mailings (if you're subscribed to groups via e-mail). The news-by-mail gateway is set up as a cron job activated every 5 minutes. It wasn't checking (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal for Revised Memorial
|
|
(...) It was my understanding that 'ldraw.org' would be registered with at least two "name servers". So anyone trying to access ldraw.org would have that request resolved to the correct IP address - which would be the hugin server. (I hope I (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Subgroup for Revamp?
|
|
Would it be a good idea to create a temporary ng just for discussion, communication, and coordination on the JJM/L-CAD site rework? It probably isn't all that necessary, but it would be an interesting experiment in short- term newsgrouping. Steve (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Parts Maintenance Idea
|
|
I'm not sure this idea has merit, it might be viewed as unnecessary or overkill. It'd definitely be one more detail to deal with in parts updates. Should we start adding maintenance comments when parts are renumbered, renamed or corrected? These (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Organizing the Site Revamp
|
|
(...) If you want to do them all at once, you may want to wait until after the content has been decided and worked on and we've got a fairly stable new site. That's probably more productive than doing image-links first. (...) I'm not sure I'm on the (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
