 | | Re: Influencing what parts people work on
|
|
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message news:FsGCEz.42y@lugnet.com... (...) least (...) have (...) Is (...) mention (...) example (...) tread (...) those (...) odd.) (...) good (...) decision (...) a (...) time (...) But (...) a (...) to (...) (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
(...) I have a few comments: 2717.dat - Technic Seat Should we call this part "Technic Seat 3 x 2 Base" for clarity? I'm aware that theere is only one technic seat at the moment, but this might change, plus a more descriptive name may be in place. (...) (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
|
[FUT lugnet.cad.dev] I've (finally) posted the page for voting on the next parts update. Before you run off to check things out, I've got a couple of items of business: First off, I want to extend apologies for taking so long on this thing. The last (...) (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | LDraw Help Desk/Reference
|
|
Greetings The ldraw.org website is in serious need of a help section for troubleshooting installation problems. It seems that on a weekly basis I receive a few emails asking about the RTE200 and Error 003. I am not very technically up to par on (...) (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev) !
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Wingback Piece - 2744.DAT
|
|
Thank you Steve and Mike! -Tom McD. when replying, spamcake was served on Jabba's barge, but for some reason no one complained. (...) site Mike (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Some Words To BFC [DAT]
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:dq3sesgb6vsh8kd...4ax.com... (...) flips (...) than (...) with (...) for (...) in (...) This makes a lot of sense to me. You are right, checking one flag per part file should not take too (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Wingback Piece - 2744.DAT
|
|
(...) That file should be in the ldraw\p directory. It appears that the only update release with this primitive file is lp97-14.exe. This update is available from the LDraw homepage, at (URL). Download times from Australia can be slow, you can try (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Where is Part 4589.dat Cone 1 x 1?
|
|
(...) I've got the 4589.dat file in my ldraw\parts directory, dated January 9, 1997. This date indicates that 4589 should be in the ldraw.exe distribution file. Oh, wait: here's the problem. As of the LCAD 97-17 update, the Cone 1x1 part was moved (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Where is Part 4589.dat Cone 1 x 1?
|
|
Hi, Playing with Ldraw yesterday I couldn't find the part 4589.dat Cone 1 x 1 in my Parts directory. I thought my Parts dirtectory were corrupted and reinstalled everything from James' ldraw.exe and all updates (lp97-13 ... -17, 10 updates in '98 (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Technic Wingback Piece - 2744.DAT
|
|
Firstly, let me say (because I don't think it's said enough) thanks to all the LDraw wizards that keep those new parts coming! Secondly, I must regret that I'm piping up in here at the moment cuz I found something that needs fixin. Let me also say (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM April
|
|
Thanks John! -Tom McD. when replying, spamcake scouring pads remove everything from your dishes, including the pattern. (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Subparts for Black Falcon and Wolfpack Patterns ?
|
|
(...) Let me rephrase that... I just make the design from the shields 50% smaller. (25 years ago, 9-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Subparts for Black Falcon and Wolfpack Patterns ?
|
|
(...) I would prefer that you do that, because you can get the sizes right. I just used 0.5x for the scaling on the shields. (25 years ago, 9-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Subparts for Black Falcon and Wolfpack Patterns ?
|
|
(...) weekend), (...) could (...) I am proposing an alternative way of handling the castle logos which are common to the shields, torsos and flags. I have put the logos into subparts. It also seems to make sense to synchronise the Pxx number across (...) (25 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Subparts for Black Falcon and Wolfpack Patterns ?
|
|
(...) That sounds like a reasonably good idea. :) Steve -- Reduce, reuse, recycle ... bits (25 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 71184 Bar 4.5L Straight is too short
|
|
(...) I hope the added length doesn't mess up any models... (but I suppose the short version made some of my models look weird on other people's machines :) (...) I'm flattered. Maybe I should attempt a complete part sometime. --Bram Bram Lambrecht (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Subparts for Black Falcon and Wolfpack Patterns ?
|
|
When I fix the bowties in the Black Falcon and Wolfpack shields (this weekend), would it be more sensible to make each pattern a subpart (or two), which could be shared between shields, torsos and flags, scaled appropriately? If I had done this to (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC checking program (was Re: Some Words To BFC)
|
|
(...) Umm, it's a little more than that, but facing the faces is a very important part. Basically, I meant: 1. All polygons wound correctly 2. All subfile references clean Good point about primitives not being solid. I don't think a renderer (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Is James' website finally gone for good?
|
|
(...) Sure. They said they'd be in contact with me as soon as they returned, so I'll bring it up then. -Tim (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
(...) Yes, it did. But I'm pretty sure that all important topics have been addressed (or re-addressed) since that thread started. (...) Yes, and today it will change to version 10. But version 4 was a big rewrite, where the language changed from (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
