 | | Re: url for the parts tracker?
|
|
(...) I get your point, but something as necessary as the parts tracker should at least contain visible links to ldraw.org, if not be hosted there. -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) Correct. Allowing mockups would cause confusion and inconsistency throughout the repository. Comment out the parts that do not exist and leave the part blank. -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) without the ghost (...) and the " 0 " NO. NO MOCK-UPS ARE ALLOWED. It doesn't matter wether or not they are commented or not. We decided to use only pieces that are 'official', parts that everyone has. Ryan (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) ok say you know the part #, and oh say you made a mockup, so (before) (ill use 2916 train front) 1 12 -4 50 10 0 0 -1 0 0 1 0 0 -1 2916.file after 0 PART NOT OFFICIAL / MISSING 0 1 12 -4 50 10 0 0 -1 0 0 1 0 0 -1 2916.file thats my idea? (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
what about for example the ghost??? do we put in a minifig without the ghost shawl??? what about the skelleton? do we put in just the skull? (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
|
|
good ieda. we simply put 4444p??.dat in 3!6 with 38 pattern and also in #16 with #7 pattern. as for names something like castle wall x by x by x with scattered stones pattern in light grey??? (25 years ago, 24-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | "Well-Formed" LDraw (Was: regular expressions for DAT file subpart lines)
|
|
(...) Nope, won't take a fraction w/o the integer part; gotta fix that (...) Nope, same reason as above (...) Nope, won't take a fraction w/o the fraction part, gotta fix that (...) Nope, same reason as above (...) Yep! Woo-Hoo!!! :-, (...) Nope, I (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: can we please work out what to do about the black castle wall pieces?
|
|
(...) That was the the ones with the light gray stones, correct? As opposed to the dark gray stones we now have. So, if we make a #16 version of the wall with light gray (#7) stones, the stones would not normally be visible. This would be a little (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: does anyone have the old version of ldlite i need for the ldao minifig modeler?
|
|
(...) I will mail you the previous version. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: url for the parts tracker?
|
|
(...) Just link to it! I understand that you want to have a standard style across the LDraw resources. And ldraw.org should always be willing to host LDraw-related content (utilities, information, etc) for anyone who wants to contribute it. But just (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
(...) I agree with you, but the advantage of the 'virtual folder' approach is that it would continue to work with LDraw, without any weird sub-directory references needed in multi-file models. Which brings me back to my original idea of having LDAO (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
(...) As I understand Jamie's idea, all model DAT's are physically stored in the /models directory. So you could only have one Ship1.dat. When you tried to create a second file with the same name, the software should warn you. Steve (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
I'm gonna butt in here and say that I would prefer having actual folders to store different themes in. Say an actual folder for space, etc. I would prefer that over a flooded /models folder. Just my $.02 Ryan ***...*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***...*** (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:376e43ee.544316...net.com... (...) through (...) And say I'm working in my "Space" virtual directory and I create a model called Ship1.dat. Does the actual Ship1.dat go into the /models (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: SW laser cannon name
|
|
Jeff Stembel <Dragonelf1@aol.com> wrote in message news:FDsL6K.4Gq@lugnet.com... (...) be (...) No, but it does "look" very space-cannon-ish, and I would venture to guess its most common use will be as a space cannon, so this makes a half-way (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) What if an element is missing? Say, a hat for example. Submit it the set, including minifig, sans hat? Jeff (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: SW laser cannon name
|
|
(...) Yes, let's put it into the Bar catagory. How about this for a name: Bar 1 x 8 w/ rounded end bricks OR Bar 1 x 8 w/ End Bricks, rounded Remember, it is not always a cannon, nor is it always in space. Jeff (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Software Download Templates
|
|
Tim, Sorry I haven't tackled the template pages for any of my utilities. I've got just a couple of comments: 1. The author of a utility should not rate the utility. If you want reviews, get other people to do them. Which isn't a bad idea--get a few (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: url for the parts tracker?
|
|
(...) We should probably incorporate that into ldraw.org as well. And have a submission form for people submitting information on parts they plan to work on or have completed. I was looking through the tracker and noticed Luis Fernandez was planning (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO Suggestion Mark 2
|
|
I believe.that it would work anyway, because its: link-dat-dat (a link goes to a dat which has a dat inside) for what he wants, not: dat-link-dat (a dat goes to a link which should be resolved to a dat). Even if it doesn't recognise C:\ldraw\models (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
