 | | Re: Voting Page
|
|
Oh, come on. That's not funny :( Seriously, what happened, I thought that he had made the neceassary changes right after he got the sets?? I really need them. Could someone possibly send me the dats that they have of them so I can use them as a (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) Why would it appear oval? The scaling would be along the Y axis. The only difference in appearance would be that the windings would not be as steeply spiralled. Which is a correct appearance. Of course, my opinion is that the most-correct (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Interesting. At least one or two of these are parts that I sent to you, but must not have arrived. I will resend. Steve (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: maandag 10 mei 1999 13:09 Subject: Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat (...) Terry answered: (...) If we (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] Could a few people test something, please?
|
|
Ouch! 30 seconds for the whole thing? Wow. Good thing there's room for improved performance in the algorithms. BTW, have you (or anyone) converted the VEC image files to 256-colors? (this would only affect the "csLoadPictures" steps) Steve (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) Another negative thing I see with this method is that the dat file _must_ be manually edited to affect the scaling change. It can't be done from LEdit. This is what makes it difficult - at least for the casual user. Karim's method can be done (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) But this kind of thing isn't done for other parts, is it? Take the bushes, wheels, gear cogs and so on; they must all be rotated to fit the axles. (...) We could just argue that the cam is essentially a pulley/wheel kind of part, rather than a (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
-----Original message----- From: jonathan wilson <wilsonj@xoommail.com> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: zondag 9 mei 1999 14:19 Subject: Re: Voting Page (...) Are we sure that train workers are dressed with this (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: maandag 10 mei 1999 4:05 Subject: Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat (...) Terry answered: (...) The idea (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) I believe all of John VanZ's SW parts are due to be released on the 19th. :-) -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Good point. An alternate idea would be to rotate it 90 degrees in the Y-plane. That would place its default position in perfect alignment with all the axles default positions. What does everyone think? Leave it as-is? Lay it down flat? Rotate (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Not sure about that one. That is kind of iffy. The term "chevron" is a pretty good description of the pattern. "worker" doesn't really add anything, as obviously the minifig is a train worker. (...) Good catch. "Shield Ovoid" would be the (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Hmm... let's see.... Ooh, ick. Yes. I will add that one as well. Good catch. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) Leave it to Karim to be clever. :-) A very interesting idea. I am somewhat chagrined to have not thought of it myself. The only difficulty is the precise rotation needed. But I expect that the simplest way of using this assembly will be by (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) The pieces submitted are in the vote. If it is not there, it has not been formally submitted. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
i also noticed that the brick 1 x 2 with ferry windows pattern, the mindstorms light sensor, the rubber boat, the harpoon, the arm towball with grabber, the technic half bush type II, the saddle, the 1 x 2 x 2, the knife, the new 9v motor and the (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) i aggreee. i was hpoing to see the slope brick 20 4 x 2, plate 3 x 3 corner round, minifig tool pickaxe, wing 6 x 12 and if it is finished the tie fighter bracket piece. (25 years ago, 9-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
Where are all the Star Wars parts John VanZ had done. I thought they were supposed to be in the next vote?? :( I am glad to see that torsos and heads have been worked on. Ryan "Build or build not. There is no try." - Lego Master Yoda ***...*** REPLY (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) I have a fourth idea. It's a bit difficult to explain, but I'll try to make it clear: There would be a total of 3 pieces to make up the shock: A) Shock lower w/ half of spring B) Shock upper C) Spring upper half Since the spiral is fairly (...) (25 years ago, 9-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) parts like this normally lie flat in the X-Z-plane in LDraw? It makes sense to compare this part with the "Liftarm" parts in LDraw, and they all span the X-Z-plane. Fredrik (25 years ago, 9-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
