 | | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
|
(...) I would smile upon that; but still, I do most of my reading through my nntp client. There has to be a way of separating the posted models from the discussions related to them. If there could be a "DAT file only" virtual ng to reflect just the (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
|
(...) Urgle, y'all. Please disregard this comment. It was typed by my evil clone as I watched -- duct-taped to the carpet and helpless with a bundle of phone cable in my mouth -- and prayed for this Monday morning to be over soon. :-P What my evil (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
|
(...) Even if Todd implemented a "DAT file only" view of each of these groups on the web site? Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 26-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Augh! How to make sure parts-stuff is current?
|
|
Hey, y'all: I'm working on adding a feature to LDAO which verifies that parts.lst and the VEC directory are up-to-date. I started to write this post asking if it was worth the effort, but now I'm wondering what steps are even necessary. I think it (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
|
(...) I'm inclined to say so, esp. since so much has been posted to this sub-tree already. (...) No, separate the discussions from these groups. It's extremely frustrating to find source when it's scattered amongst ten times more messages discussing (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | RE: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
|
|
(...) I really doubt people choose a "~Moved to xxx.dat" part when browsing in LEdit! Why should they? It doesn't have a description, so how would you know what part it is? If people are using "~Moved to" parts, it must be because they thought they (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: "~moved to" files and parts.lst
|
|
(...) I double-checked this, and what Terry says is true for LDAO. Which is good. The bad news is that LDAO simply replaces the old part number with the new part number. It should be doing an inline operation. Steve (25 years ago, 26-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | three wheeler piece
|
|
Has any one made the three wheeler peice (or a mockup, i just need the main part not the front forks) yet? I would check the parts tracker but I lost the link. The reason for the peice is this, I found a way to build them up into really cool (...) (25 years ago, 25-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Shell Extension DLL for lcd and dat files
|
|
(...) Nope. Won't work. Same error. I placed everything in the zip file in my c:\windows\system\ directory. Went to the dos prompt, CD'd to system and ran the command c:\windows\system\regsvr32 shlext.dll -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 25-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
|
(...) I like the above groups and follow-ups quite well. You might consider adding lugnet.cad.dat.models.alt (followup-to lugnet.cad). (...) Unless you wanted a lugnet.cad-dat.* heirarchy. Either way works. (...) IMHO the main reason for dividing up (...) (25 years ago, 24-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
