 | | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
|
|
(...) side of (...) I do agree as well, Todd. Thanks again for taking this situation and calming it down and thanks for your patience in the matter. Keep Building!! -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 You've seen their sites and read their (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Dimensions of the parts
|
|
Sproaticus skrev i meddelandet <371256D6.4EEC8895@g...es.com>... (...) Yup, you caught me there... I'm mostly thinking in the BlockCAD universe, where the pieces _must_ be convex. (...) located on (...) But I should have thought of this anyhow :-( (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Shockwave Flash
|
|
(...) I guess I didn't fully state my intentions. I will create both a non-shockwave and shockwave versions, for the enjoyment of those who like a cool little animated site. I didn't intend on placing Shockwave as a priority over the non-shockwave (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Dimensions of the parts
|
|
(...) These only work for convex pieces. The hollow areas in a concave piece would not be handled properly, since at least one wall would actually move *closer* to the other piece. For example, consider a clip. If you scale its position by 1.01, the (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Dimensions of the parts
|
|
Leonardo Zide skrev i meddelandet <3711E2FA.17EB08D@ce...com.br>... (...) to (...) - Scale the piece dimensions by 0.9 or something like that for comparisons - remember to use a _central_ point as origin for the scaling (hmm, sounds like heavy (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
|
|
I agree with that, Todd. Scott Sanburn (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
|
|
(...) Is this an attempt to model part #30014? If so, it is incorrect in at least three very obvious ways -- (a) the vertical placement of ARM1.DAT, (b) the use of ARM1.DAT in the first place, and (c) the use of 3004.DAT, where a new element should (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts DESPERATLY wanted (steve: please read)
|
|
(...) I made the same mistake, until I went to the store, and looked at the plates. Steve (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with computer screen and buttons pattern [DAT]
|
|
(...) Try something like: 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4-4disc.DAT 1 16 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4-4ndis.DAT For the buttons/lights. That looked pretty good when I used it to build a panel of the three buttons. Not great at Zoom=1, but more accurate (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: fixed part: JW's parts
|
|
(...) I would not tell anyone anything like that. The question really isn't whether or not the *parts* can be improved. A better question would be: are you able to improve them? Part of the answer to that depends on your ability to work as part of (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
