Subject:
|
Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 12 Apr 1999 18:44:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
794 times
|
| |
|
|
I agree with that, Todd.
Scott Sanburn
Todd Lehman wrote:
>
> In lugnet.cad.dat, Jonathan Wilson writes:
> > here you go
> >
> > 0 Brick 1 x 2 with Arm 2F
> > 0 File: 30014.DAT
> > 0 Author: Jonathan Wilson
> > 0 Un-Official Element
> >
> > 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3004.DAT
> > 1 16 0 12 -10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ARM1.DAT
>
> Is this an attempt to model part #30014? If so, it is incorrect in at least
> three very obvious ways -- (a) the vertical placement of ARM1.DAT, (b) the
> use of ARM1.DAT in the first place, and (c) the use of 3004.DAT, where a new
> element should have been designed to codify the 2 LDU extrusion on the side of
> the brick.
>
> Does anyone agree with a suggestion that appeared in lugnet.admin.general to
> the effect of Jonathan being formally be asked by the group to take a break
> from this or lose his posting privileges?
>
> --Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
|
| (...) Is this an attempt to model part #30014? If so, it is incorrect in at least three very obvious ways -- (a) the vertical placement of ARM1.DAT, (b) the use of ARM1.DAT in the first place, and (c) the use of 3004.DAT, where a new element should (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
