Subject:
|
Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 12 Apr 1999 21:41:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
734 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ...
> Does anyone agree with a suggestion that appeared in lugnet.admin.general • to
> the effect of Jonathan being formally be asked by the group to take a break
> from this or lose his posting privileges?
Disagree. It is easier to use the carrot than the stick. When the LCAD
moved to LUGNET it was discussed that this would open the group to a wider
variety of persons. Now we have the first case of dispute and someone wants
an exclusion. Them thars fightin' words!
Roy
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
|
| (...) Is this an attempt to model part #30014? If so, it is incorrect in at least three very obvious ways -- (a) the vertical placement of ARM1.DAT, (b) the use of ARM1.DAT in the first place, and (c) the use of 3004.DAT, where a new element should (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
