Subject:
|
Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 Apr 1999 11:19:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
884 times
|
| |
|
|
i am listening to the group. i will do everything i can to accually get some
lego to work from. at the monent i have a bag of lego (not mine) that i am
looking at, but all the parts that guy had that were not in ldraw are too hard
IMHO to model e.g. the dragon,the horse,the bow and arrow.
if i can get a raised baseplate part then i will check mine against the real
thing and fix any problems. how accurate do i have to be? is 5ldu accurate
enough for e.g. the positioning of studs etc?
any tery are you saying you are going to ignore any parts i send you? i gather
from what you are saying you are...
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
|
| (...) No, 5LDU is not accurate enough, especially for studs. Regular studs are always spaced *exactly* 20LDU apart. The only exceptions are some very odd, small bits. Depending on the part, studs will either be positioned on the even-number (...) (25 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
|
| (...) No. I will not ignore them. But I don't look forward to slogging through a bunch of parts finding obvious, glaring errors. Ones that should _NOT_ be there in pieces submitted for voting. And I can only assume that the errors are there because: (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
|
| (...) Agreed. Ditto. What Todd said. I second that. In spades. Jonathan, you have been reading these types of comments for quite a while now. Has _any_ of it sunk in? -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
