Subject:
|
Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 14 Apr 1999 03:54:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1120 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Apr 1999 11:19:31 GMT, "jonathan wilson" <wilsonj@xoommail.com>
wrote:
> i am listening to the group. i will do everything i can to accually get some
> lego to work from. at the monent i have a bag of lego (not mine) that i am
> looking at, but all the parts that guy had that were not in ldraw are too hard
> IMHO to model e.g. the dragon,the horse,the bow and arrow.
>
> if i can get a raised baseplate part then i will check mine against the real
> thing and fix any problems. how accurate do i have to be? is 5ldu accurate
> enough for e.g. the positioning of studs etc?
>
> any tery are you saying you are going to ignore any parts i send you? i gather
> from what you are saying you are...
No. I will not ignore them. But I don't look forward to slogging through a
bunch of parts finding obvious, glaring errors. Ones that should _NOT_ be
there in pieces submitted for voting.
And I can only assume that the errors are there because:
A. You don't look at actual parts, so you don't know any better.
B. You don't care, or somehow just can't see those errors.
Either way, the results are unacceptable.
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
|
| i am listening to the group. i will do everything i can to accually get some lego to work from. at the monent i have a bag of lego (not mine) that i am looking at, but all the parts that guy had that were not in ldraw are too hard IMHO to model e.g. (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
