To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 1174
1173  |  1175
Subject: 
Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Mon, 12 Apr 1999 18:11:49 GMT
Viewed: 
845 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dat, Jonathan Wilson writes:
here you go

0 Brick  1 x  2 with Arm 2F
0 File: 30014.DAT
0 Author: Jonathan Wilson
0 Un-Official Element

1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3004.DAT
1 16 0 12 -10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ARM1.DAT

Is this an attempt to model part #30014?  If so, it is incorrect in at least
three very obvious ways -- (a) the vertical placement of ARM1.DAT, (b) the
use of ARM1.DAT in the first place, and (c) the use of 3004.DAT, where a new
element should have been designed to codify the 2 LDU extrusion on the side of
the brick.

Does anyone agree with a suggestion that appeared in lugnet.admin.general to
the effect of Jonathan being formally be asked by the group to take a break
from this or lose his posting privileges?

--Todd



Message has 7 Replies:
  Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
 
I agree with that, Todd. Scott Sanburn (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
  (canceled)
 
  (canceled)
 
  Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
 
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) to (...) Disagree. It is easier to use the carrot than the stick. When the LCAD moved to LUGNET it was discussed that this would open the group to a wider variety of persons. Now we have the first case of (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
  Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
 
(...) I apologize for this comment. I realize that it was completely uncalled for and terribly degrading and cheap in nature. Jonathan and all; please forgive me for my unnecessary comment. I will work to have my original post cancelled. Keep (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
  Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
 
what do you mean use of arm1.dat? should i have used arm2.dat? (25 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
  Re: part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F
 
(Repost, to fix a lugnetter ID problem I was having yesterday. :-) (...) (I knew I said that I'd stay out of this, but argh argh argh argh fooey.) I like Jacob's suggestion, for him to volunteer to mentor Johnathan for a month on a trial basis. (...) (25 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  part: brick 1 x 2 with arm 2F  [DAT]
 
here you go 0 Brick 1 x 2 with Arm 2F 0 File: 30014.DAT 0 Author: Jonathan Wilson 0 Un-Official Element 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3004.DAT 1 16 0 12 -10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ARM1.DAT (25 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dat)

15 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR