To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.partsOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / 6136
6135  |  6137
Subject: 
Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature???
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
Date: 
Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:57:00 GMT
Viewed: 
5085 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Travis Cobbs wrote:
Travis it has to do with parsing.  For type 1 lines and 8.3 I can simply use
sscanf.

Kevin

Sorry for posting to my own post.  In particular if the "longer file names"
cannot have blanks in the names, then there is no problem for LPub or LSynth.
20.3 would require no changes at to LPub or LSynth.

Given that sscanf splits things up by whitespace, I think LPub and LSynth would
misparse file names with blanks or tabs in them.

OK, that makes a lot more sense.  LDView had the same problem with whitespace in
filenames until I specifically added support for that.  (LDView now gives you a
warning when it encounters whitespace in a filename.)

--Travis



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature???
 
(...) Sorry for posting to my own post. In particular if the "longer file names" cannot have blanks in the names, then there is no problem for LPub or LSynth. 20.3 would require no changes at to LPub or LSynth. Given that sscanf splits things up by (...) (18 years ago, 28-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

25 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR