Subject:
|
Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature???
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:53:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4990 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Don Heyse wrote:
> there's always another way. One that preserves the
> precious backwards compatibility. In this case you could make
> more subdirectories in the official library. Like the LDRAW/P/48
> directory that was created to avoid name conflicts between high
> and low resolution primitives. (Just tossing that into the mix
> for consideration.)
To elaborate: Suppose you have a part abcdefg.dat with loads
of subparts (Too many to name with the 8.3 restriction).
Just make a new subdirectory LDRAW/PARTS/S/abcdefg/ and put the
numbered subparts in there (like LDRAW/PARTS/S/abcdefg/99999999.dat)
This has the added benefit of tidying up the S directory a bit.
Don
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature???
|
| (...) I'm personally undecided on the issue of long filenames. On the one hand Willy is entirely correct that we probably shouldn't disallow them purely because of ldraw.exe/ledit.exe. On the other hand, Kevin's post that LPub/LSynth would both have (...) (18 years ago, 28-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Getting rif off the 8.3 nomenclature???
|
| (...) Yeah, but there's always another way. One that preserves the precious backwards compatibility. In this case you could make more subdirectories in the official library. Like the LDRAW/P/48 directory that was created to avoid name conflicts (...) (18 years ago, 28-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
