| | Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT Karl Asha
|
| | While trying to create the 1x2 tile with keyboard pattern piece, I ran into a problem that I have broken down into a simple example: 0 Tile 1 x 2 test 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\3069bs01.dat 4 16 20 0 10 -20 0 10 -20 0 -10 20 0 -10 Can someone (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT Karl Asha
|
| | | | I appear to have answered my own question, though I don't understand the answer :) It seems that if the part is located in the LDRAW\MODELS directory, the extended face problem exists. If the part is moved into LDRAW\PARTS, however, the problem (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT Niels Karsdorp
|
| | | | (...) Do you have the seam option turned on? This option causes the parts to be scaled a little smaller to generate the seams between parts. For rendering single parts, turn the seam option off. Niels (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT Orion Pobursky
|
| | | | (...) I assume you converted this code: 0 Tile 1 x 2 test 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\3069bs01.dat 4 16 20 0 10 -20 0 10 -20 0 -10 20 0 -10 The explaination is that L3P shrinks all the parts/subparts (i.e. Type 1 lines) slightly for the seam (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT Karl Asha
|
| | | | In my problem description I didn't mention that I had actually included the part in an mlcad model, so effectively it was created as a Type 1 line. The solution to the problem though seems to have been removing the part from the ldraw models (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT Orion Pobursky
|
| | | | (...) Hmmm... Lars will have to give conformation of this but I think L3P was handling your part as a submodel. That would explain why the tile subpart was shrunk when it was in any other directory but the parts directory -Orion (22 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT Lars C. Hassing
|
| | | | (...) Confirmed! Well spotted. Any non-scaling reference to a part is shrunk, except if the reference is from a part. A part is currently defined as a file located in PARTS. "s\3069bs01.dat" (as a path) is located in PARTS. When the new part was in (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) text, so it's at least available on the website. Steve (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Problems with new part and S\3069BS01.DAT Karl Asha
|
| | | | Wanting to confirm one other thing. Is it intentional that a .ldr file with the same name as a part will not actually be procssed and result in a .pov file with only the part? In this case, I was constructing set 4532 and found a pov file with just (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |