Subject:
|
Re: More accurate hand? (was Re: Work-in-progress improved minifig arm)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Apr 2002 02:11:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1710 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Ryan Farrington writes:
> Sorry, all, :] I forgot Steve Bliss already briefly mentioned redoing the
> hand, so ignore anything in my post that sounds like I'm the only one who
> ever thought of it. :)
I might have talked about it, but I'm not doing anything on it right now.
Feel free to run with it. :)
> > I wonder if it would be worth it to re-make the minifig hands too. The
> > hand
> > should tilt away from the hand "stem" at an angle of about 15 degrees.
> > Right
> > now, to get the correct angle of the hand to the arm, the hand has to be
> > tilted so the solids intersect.
I think I measured it at 17 degrees once, but I might have mis-measured (or
be misremembering). Or maybe Tore told me that was the angle. It's been
awhile.
Steve
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | is BOX5.DAT really BFC compliant?
|
| I've been working on the BFC code in my application, and well, either I need to go to bed now (which is probably true either way :) or the BOX5.DAT primitive slipped into the last update with wrong-way wound quad. Am I reading this right? (...) This (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
