Subject:
|
Re: Part x176
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Apr 2002 02:08:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1752 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Ross Crawford writes:
> Is there any reason an "x" number cannot co-exist with a matching "real"
> number? Surely, if the correct number is subsequently obtained, the "xnnn" can
> be changed to a "moved-to" stub. Is this just to avoid confusion?
The "x" is a temporary prefix, indicating that it's a new part for which we
don't know the real part number. If we don't find the real number before
the new file is made official, the "x" is dropped. There's no point in
having an "xnnn" number when the "nnn" is an official number -- we can't
release the part that way, so why even start out with it?
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Part x176
|
| (...) Is there any reason an "x" number cannot co-exist with a matching "real" number? Surely, if the correct number is subsequently obtained, the "xnnn" can be changed to a "moved-to" stub. Is this just to avoid confusion? (...) OK. Ta. ROSCO (22 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
