 | | Re: 6002 mpd version, now I think I got it. —Don Heyse
|
| | | Ok I dug up the hires ring generator program I made when I did 30056.dat and generated hires versions of 1-4rin18.dat 1-4ring9.dat so now it's all there in glorious hires with no ugly seams. 0 FILE 6002.dat 0 part 6002 round Panel 6 x 6 x 9 with (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 6002 mpd version, now I think I got it. —Mark Kennedy
|
| | | | | (...) You might want to consider submitting those new hi-res primitives for inclusion in the next parts update, they could probably be used in other files as well. (24 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 6002 mpd version, now I think I got it. —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | (...) Sure, but if you're going to submit the hi-res version of 6002.dat then why don't you just submit the new primitives along with it in an MPD file? I think that's reasonable. By the way, do you happen to know if the hi-res sphere primitive has (...) (24 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 6002 mpd version, now I think I got it. —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | | (...) I don't *think* it has been submitted. Then again, new primitives are handled differently than new part files. Steve (24 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 6002 mpd version, now I think I got it. —Mark Kennedy
|
| | | | | | (...) Actualy I think it would be better to submit the primitives seperately so they can be used on other models as well, plus it makes the file smaller which was why I split the piece up in the first place. I'm somewhat of a byte miser trying to (...) (24 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 6002 mpd version, now I think I got it. —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | (...) I was under the impression that you can submit them all as one MPD file and then someone in charge takes it apart and puts the individual files in the right directories (as long as the MPD file contains the paths). After all, LEDIT doesn't (...) (24 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Some submission guidelines (was: Re: 6002 mpd version, now I think I got it.) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Don Heyse wrote something that triggered me to write at length: (...) Posting to lugnet.cad.dat.parts as an MPD is cool. It's better than the alternative (posting several messages, possibly pointing links to (...) (24 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Part Authoring FAQ (was Re:Some submission guidelines...) —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | (...) Oops, sorry about that. Really all this info should be added to the FAQ on www.ldraw.org. All the FAQ says about submitting is "When you have finished the part, you should check it for technical mistakes with l3p -check, and then send it to (...) (24 years ago, 11-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | 6002, similar to 6909? —Ronald Scott Moody
|
| | | | Don and Mark, I recently aquired partn number 6909 which is a 4 x 4 x 6 (?) Round Panel with Spherous Top. I can't help but notice how similar it is to 6002 and was wondering if you two were going to try to make that part also. I tried a little, but (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 6002, similar to 6909? —Mark Kennedy
|
| | | | (...) I haven't seen this part yet, but I have 6059 which is a 3 x 3 x 6 round panel with a spherous top. the problem I discovered was that the top part wasn't a true sphere so I would not be able to use the sphere primitives and the file size would (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Anybody working on 6909? (Was: 6002, similar to 6909?) —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | | Mark: (...) Have you - or somebody else - started working on <part:6059>[1]? I could use it (well, actually I have used it) for the building instructions for Katrines bus stop[2]. If nobody else dares to try, then I will give it a try myself. Play (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Anybody working on 6909? (Was: 6002, similar to 6909?) —Mark Kennedy
|
| | | | (...) part would be a real pain -er- challenge. The non spherical parts shouldn't be too much trouble though. If you or anybody else decides to take it on I wish you the best of luck. (23 years ago, 19-Jul-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Anybody working on 6909? (Was: 6002, similar to 6909?) —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | | Mark: (...) Ok. I made a rough sketch of it. There are (practically no horizontal lines), the end surfaces are missing, so is the single stud on the top and it is offset 10 LDraw units from its proper origin, but it is enough for me at the moment. (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jul-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| | | | |
