 | | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
|
(...) <SNIP> (...) New versions of the 1x4 parts are on the PT now (URL) please, before I apply the same changes to the other parts. Chris (20 years ago, 20-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)? [DAT]
|
|
(...) We are both partially right - but there is a generic problem with these parts. The important dimension is the position of the axis of rotation of the click hinge, relative to the brick. For the geometry to work this must be the same distance (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5
|
|
Guess what? I missed this update! I do not have any of the parts in it in my library. Thanks for pointing it out Willy. Jaco (...) (20 years ago, 16-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5
|
|
(...) of the underside area is missing. (...) SNIP 2003-03 New Parts Preview (URL) 30249.dat - Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5 (URL) w. (20 years ago, 15-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5
|
|
(...) Being indeed part 30249, why is (...) it is: 2003-03 New Parts Preview (URL) 30249.dat - Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5 (URL) w. (20 years ago, 15-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5 [DAT]
|
|
(...) 0 Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5 0 Name: 30249.dat 0 Author: Joseph H. Cardana 0 Unofficial LDraw part 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 2 24 10 120 -100 10 116 -100 2 24 6 120 -96 6 116 -96 2 24 -6 116 -96 6 116 -96 2 24 -6 120 -96 -6 116 -96 2 24 -6 4 -20 -6 116 (...) (20 years ago, 15-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5
|
|
You have a duplicated quad on the non sloped outside surface. Also the top part of the underside area is missing. (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5 [DAT]
|
|
0 Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5 0 Name: 30249.dat 0 Author: Joseph H. Cardana 0 Unofficial LDraw part 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 2 24 10 120 -100 10 116 -100 2 24 6 120 -96 6 116 -96 2 24 -6 116 -96 6 116 -96 2 24 -6 120 -96 -6 116 -96 2 24 -6 4 -20 -6 116 -96 2 24 (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5
|
|
(...) Do so. Please remove those incompatible ROTATION CENTER and ROTATION CONFIG lines and either add BFC NOCERTIFY or BFC-certify it. /Tore (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5
|
|
Taking another closer look, I noticed only the center and zero point are wrong, but that can easily be fixed. I have done so, but would like to credit the original author on this part. "Jaco van der Molen" <jmolen@zonnet.nl> schreef in bericht (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5
|
|
(...) This is a very old message, but I needed this part and thought it was part of the official parts for a long time... Being indeed part 30249, why is this one still not part of the library? I can see nothing wrong with it, beside it is not BFC (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
|
(...) my click hinges, and the lugs are ALL closer to the top of vertical end wall than the bottom. The position of the lug in your new version is definitely incorrect. Whether thats a problem with the primitive or the sub-part I don't know, but it (...) (20 years ago, 10-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
|
(...) Actually its the other way about. 30387 is wrong. More accurately, the subpart s/30387s01.dat does not match the guidance notes in p/clh1 and p/clh4. 0 // Placement on side of bricks; rotate accordingly, 0 // place on side 10 Ldu below top (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 30299.dat Rock Raiders Canopy base
|
|
(...) The link to the 30298.dat mockup has expired. Do you or anyone you know have a copy of it? (20 years ago, 9-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Part 2495, Minifig Hand Truck
|
|
Has anyone heard anything new about the minifig Hand Truck, part number 2495 (URL) ? Last thing I've noticed is from two years ago, someone said "nope, not yet". I was just seeing if anyone was working on it. It's not in the parts tracker, but that (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: high res bushlocks? [DAT]
|
|
(...) You're probably right. I just remembered that the bushlocks are divided into 32 segments which is fairly colse to 48. Though the notches in bushloc3 would probably align better with the studs if they used the high res primitves at least in (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
|
(...) without measuring, just by sight, I'd say the 1x2 is the incorrect one, it's lugs should be moved up to match the 1x4 ROSCO (20 years ago, 6-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
|
(...) Joel Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I'll do what I can to correct the official part library in the next parts update. Chris Dee (20 years ago, 6-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: high res bushlocks?
|
|
(...) I think they are fine the way they are. The basic reason is size. The bushlocks are 20 LDU in diameter. 48-segment primitives are not needed until you get to 80 LDU diameter curves. If you need to put 48-segment primitives with a bushlock, (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for Roborider parts
|
|
(...) I believe both of those parts are on the Parts Tracker. Search through the list at (URL) (20 years ago, 5-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
