 | | Re: Need part number for a dangerous predator
|
|
(...) Thanks! The edge lines I put in for Ldraw's and MLcad's sake; they make it easier to see the important features of the cat's face, plus the edge along the bottom I think is important to preserve. In POV-Ray of course they vanish, though. I (...) (24 years ago, 25-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Need part number for a dangerous predator
|
|
(...) I think it's a pretty amazing first part! Nice work. I'm not sure about use of the edge lines on things like the eyes, etc. These get lost when you POV. If there really are marks or grooves in the part there, you may want to try to model them. (...) (24 years ago, 25-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Need part number for a dangerous predator
|
|
(...) Sounds like this is not the part number. Many parts have numbers of the form "n nn" or "n-nn" which probably refer to indivudual sites within the injection mould. Only the larger ones have room to include the TLC part number, typically in the (...) (24 years ago, 25-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Need part number for a dangerous predator
|
|
(...) Interesting... I never noticed the part numbers before. On the cat, all I can see is some writing in the stud hole underneath: (c) LEGO 1 07 That 7 might be a 1; it's very hard to tell because it's at the very edge. However 1 07 as far as I (...) (24 years ago, 25-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Need part number for a dangerous predator
|
|
(...) Welcome!!! I just looked at the cat part. Pretty good for a first part! But i can not help you with the part number, Although it should be printed some where on the part. Any how, welcome as a member to the CAD Community. C-Ya!! --Austin (24 years ago, 25-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Bendible Objects?
|
|
For bendable axles and electric wires you could use my bend thingie creator. The axles are the best but the wires aren't that great. (URL) <pobursky@hotmail.com> schreef in berichtnieuws G9AqJE.861@lugnet.com... (...) found (...) Technis (...) (...) (24 years ago, 25-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Need part number for a dangerous predator [DAT]
|
|
Submitted for your approval, my very first Ldraw part: The cat. I'm a newbie to the program, via MLcad, and I've been enjoying the experience a lot. I really needed this part, and as far as I could see no one was working on it, so I decided to try a (...) (24 years ago, 25-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Bendible Objects?
|
|
What's the easiest way to form bendilble object in the DAT format? I found a utility for hose part 754 but nothing for tubes, hoses in various Technis sets, flexible axles, etc... Is there another utility out there? Also, on a side note, I'm trying (...) (24 years ago, 25-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: part 10034 mockup
|
|
Thanks for the improvements. I used this important part on many models, and it's a shame there's STILL no official version availible (this complaint goes to all of the other part-developers)! Primus BuS ComStar LEGO Mechcommander: www.go.to/legoMC (24 years ago, 25-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Number for hoses/tubes ?
|
|
(...) They are the same. (...) I also think that there are no standard numbers for the tubes but I need something for LeoCAD. Can we use numbers from the 3 digits range ? Leonardo (24 years ago, 24-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | part 10034 mockup [DAT]
|
|
I decided to try and do a little work on this part. It is a bit more complete than the mockup. But it is still messy. I am having trouble with the complex panels. I still want to add some little boxes to it to make it more acurate and try to get the (...) (24 years ago, 24-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Torus primitive discussion.
|
|
(...) OK, Got it! Sounds good to me. So we are going to use; tNNxFFFF.dat t=Torus NN=sweep of torus, 01=1/1, 02=1/2, 04=1/4, 08=1/8, 16=1/16, 48=1/48? x=i:Inner or o:Outer FFFF=Tube Radius Ex. 1/3=3333 I have already changed my spreadsheets and (...) (24 years ago, 24-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Torus primitive discussion. was( Updated Primitive - 1-8t0102 1/8 torus)
|
|
(...) OK, let me try to explain. Lars had suggested: (...) Which uses 7 characters in the filename, out of the 8 allowed. I just dedicated the 8th character to N, so we had NN instead. This gives us a fixed-format for the filename, no matter what (...) (24 years ago, 23-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Has anyone made the wheels as seen in 5920
|
|
(...) Please ignore my other post, as I've said, I missed my Java. NOW I see that you're talkin' virtual Lego. Bah, go back to your normal broadcasting! Not paying attention, Aaron (24 years ago, 23-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Has anyone made the wheels as seen in 5920
|
|
(...) How do you mean? I've assembled them from this set (and many other Adventurer sets), but only TLC "makes" them. Sorry, but I missed my cup o' Java today... Best, Aaron (24 years ago, 23-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Has anyone made the wheels as seen in 5920
|
|
Has anyone made the wheels as seen in the Island Racer? (URL) Spears (24 years ago, 23-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Has anyone made a DAT for...?
|
|
(...) Doh! I had been looking under wheels.... forgot to check technic completely... DaveE (24 years ago, 23-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Has anyone made a DAT for...?
|
|
I think you mean: 32007.dat Technic Tread Wheel Sprocket -John Van "David Eaton" <deaton@intdata.com> wrote in message news:G97t1B.473@lugnet.com... (...) in: (...) (24 years ago, 23-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Has anyone made a DAT for...?
|
|
Has anyone made (or have plans to make) a DAT for the tread wheels found in: 7191 X-wing Fighter (grey & tan, on wing lasers) 8414 Mountain Rambler (yellow) 9719 Robotics Invention System 1.0 (white) ? DaveE (24 years ago, 23-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New part, need a part number.
|
|
"rmoody" <RonaldScottMoody@netscape.net> wrote in message news:G979s0.J5G@lugnet.com... (...) boxes (...) It's (...) Cool, now I can tidy up my 7146 TIE dat file on BrickShelf, and the Interceptor MOC I posted. DATs at (URL) , I haven't made the (...) (24 years ago, 23-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New part, need a part number.
|
|
Well, just as long as the part is there :). I just couldn't make my TIE Fighter cockpit without it. About the only thing I added was the little boxes on the underside. That was not to hard once I figured out how to do it. It's not exactly intuative. (...) (24 years ago, 23-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Updated Part - 3837 Minifig Shovel [DAT]
|
|
(...) I have removed the edge line as suggested. Paul (URL) (Main Ldraw Index) (URL) (Finished parts) (URL) (In process) 0 Minifig Shovel 0 Name: 3837.dat 0 Author: Paul Easter 0 Unofficial Element 0 CATEGORY Minifig 0 KEYWORDS minifig, shovel 0 0 (...) (24 years ago, 23-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Torus primitive discussion. was( Updated Primitive - 1-8t0102 1/8 torus)
|
|
Ok, Let me see if I can make some sense of this... I have read it sevaral times. (...) OK, great! (...) Sorry, can't seem to follow this statement. (...) OK. (...) I agree, but not sure about the 3.6 degree version, that's a bit extreme. (...) ah... (...) (24 years ago, 23-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: New part, need a part number.
|
|
(...) No, you weren't, but your version is more detailed. You might download Tore's mockup of the part, and compare your version to his, to look for differences. But then you gotta figure out whose file is more accurate... Steve (24 years ago, 22-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New part, need a part number.
|
|
Well, it apears that I was not the first to create this part. I honestly tried to find it, really I did :). Thanks for the help. (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Number for hoses/tubes ?
|
|
(...) Are the old technic hoses the same hoses used in the classic space? I definitely don't have those numbers, either way. My understanding is that there are quite a few part numbers for the modern tube items, because of the large number of (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New part, need a part number.
|
|
(...) It's part 30283, as noted in (URL). Nice job on the part file. Steve (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Number for hoses/tubes ?
|
|
Hi, Does anyone have the part numbers for the black rubber hoses used on old technic sets (8L ?), for the pneumatic tubes and also the tubes used in modern technic sets (several sizes) ? Leonardo (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New part, need a part number.
|
|
Ronald: It looks correct now, but I haven't got the real thing here, so I can't say anything for certain. Play well, Jacob (24 years ago, 20-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New part, need a part number. [DAT]
|
|
Ok, I figured it out. The original part used the rect.dat primitive which I replaced (I'm a neophite) with a quadrilateral. Soooo, I redid it again with a RECT.DAT instead of the quarilateral the way the original was and maybe this is more correct? (...) (24 years ago, 20-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New part, need a part number. [DAT]
|
|
Hmm, I see what you were refering to, I think. If I am not too mistaken, the original part I started with were missing these as well. Check it out again if you don't mind. :) Oh, how do I get a part number for this? (...) 0 Author : Ronald Scott (...) (24 years ago, 20-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New part, need a part number.
|
|
Ronald: Looks ok, but at least one of the lines marking the change from horizontal to vertical is missing. Play well, Jacob (24 years ago, 20-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New part, need a part number. [DAT]
|
|
I made this part by editing 4854.dat Slope 45 4 x 4 Double Inverted. I needed this part to build a MLcad version of the TIE Fighter. I need a part number for this. Also, I am sure that it will need some error checking. 0 Author : Ronald Scott Moody (...) (24 years ago, 20-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 6578 Tyre 30.4 x 14 VR [DAT]
|
|
The file 6578s.dat in the following mpd file must be placed in the parts/s subdirectory 0 FILE 6578.mpd 0 Tyre 30.4 x 14 VR 0 Name: Untitled.dat 0 Author: Marc Klein 0 Unofficial Part 0 0 FILE 6578.dat 0 Tyre 30.4 x 14 VR 0 Name: 6578.dat 0 Author: (...) (24 years ago, 18-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | NEW PART: 30414 Brick 1 x 4 with Studs On One Side [DAT]
|
|
0 Brick 1 x 4 with Studs On One Side 0 Name: 30414.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Un-Official LCad Part 1 16 20 4 0 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud3.dat 1 16 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud3.dat 1 16 -20 4 0 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud3.dat 1 16 0 24 0 36 0 0 0 (...) (24 years ago, 17-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Torus primitive discussion. was( Updated Primitive - 1-8t0102 1/8 torus)
|
|
(...) How about using: TNNXFFFF.dat Where T is T, NN is the fraction of the major circle, X is I/O for inner or outer, and FFFF is the fractional ratio of tube radius to major radius. I'm suggesting this specific format for the following reasons: 1. (...) (24 years ago, 16-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Torus primitive discussion. was( Updated Primitive - 1-8t0102 1/8 torus)
|
|
Paul Easter wrote... (...) Sure, I'm just awaiting the final filename convention, so that I can make a programmatic (versus hardcoded) substitution covering all future primitives released. Something like "NtiFFFF.dat" for "1/N Torus Tube Inner Major (...) (24 years ago, 15-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Does this part Exist? [DAT]
|
|
(...) Would it be somthing that looked like this? I have a vague idea that I've seen such a part at one time, but I could be mistajing it for the not inverted version. 0 Untitled 0 Name: mockup.dat 0 Author: MLCad 0 Unofficial Model 0 ROTATION (...) (24 years ago, 15-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2610.dat Minifig Lifevest
|
|
Hi, I saw your original post, and looked at the images you posted. They looked fine. As far as the DAT file being so large, according to the "\parts" directory on my PC's hard drive, your files isn't the absolute largest; that honor went to (...) (24 years ago, 15-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 30414: Brick 1 x 4 with 4 side studs: Has this part been done?
|
|
(...) Acually, i would like to use your mockup and compare any differences. It may help me find and fix fatal misstakes. --Austin (24 years ago, 15-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
