To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitivesOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / Primitives / 146
145  |  147
Subject: 
Re: Torus primitive discussion. was( Updated Primitive - 1-8t0102 1/8 torus)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives
Date: 
Fri, 23 Feb 2001 19:03:47 GMT
Viewed: 
4562 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Paul Easter wrote:

Ok, Let me see if I can make some sense of this... I have read it sevaral times.

In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Steve Bliss writes:

How about using:

TNNXFFFF.dat

2. Dedicating the one free filename digit/character to one of the numeric
parameters will also provide more filename consistency and sorting.  And
giving this the major-circle denominator is more important than having a
fifth position in the tube:major-radius fraction.

Sorry, can't seem to follow this statement.

OK, let me try to explain.  Lars had suggested:

Something like "NtiFFFF.dat" for
"1/N Torus Tube  Inner  Major Radius 1  Tube Radius 0.FFFF"

Which uses 7 characters in the filename, out of the 8 allowed.  I just
dedicated the 8th character to N, so we had NN instead.

This gives us a fixed-format for the filename, no matter what the value of
NN is.  Fixed-formats sort better.

Which values of N do you expect? 16? - since you only got 4 F's?

I'd expect probably 04, 08, and 16.  If we start getting hi-res versions of
torii, we might see higher values (smaller sweeps).  With two decimal
digits, we can get down to a 3.6-degree sweep (that'd be 1/99).

I agree, but not sure about the 3.6 degree version, that's a bit extreme.

Yeah 1/99 is extreme, that's kinda my point.  We have more than enough
range in our possible numeric values.

About coding the t:m ratio in base-36, Paul reacted:

oh no! too complex for the mainstream dat authors.

True.  We'd have to publish a table of values.

But I think four base-10 decimal digits is probably good enough.

Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Torus primitive discussion.
 
(...) OK, Got it! Sounds good to me. So we are going to use; tNNxFFFF.dat t=Torus NN=sweep of torus, 01=1/1, 02=1/2, 04=1/4, 08=1/8, 16=1/16, 48=1/48? x=i:Inner or o:Outer FFFF=Tube Radius Ex. 1/3=3333 I have already changed my spreadsheets and (...) (24 years ago, 24-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Torus primitive discussion. was( Updated Primitive - 1-8t0102 1/8 torus)
 
Ok, Let me see if I can make some sense of this... I have read it sevaral times. (...) OK, great! (...) Sorry, can't seem to follow this statement. (...) OK. (...) I agree, but not sure about the 3.6 degree version, that's a bit extreme. (...) ah... (...) (24 years ago, 23-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)

16 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR