Subject:
|
Re: New part, need a part number.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:46:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
916 times
|
| |
|
|
Ronald:
It looks correct now, but I haven't got the real thing
here, so I can't say anything for certain.
Play well,
Jacob
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New part, need a part number. [DAT]
|
| Ok, I figured it out. The original part used the rect.dat primitive which I replaced (I'm a neophite) with a quadrilateral. Soooo, I redid it again with a RECT.DAT instead of the quarilateral the way the original was and maybe this is more correct? (...) (24 years ago, 20-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
