 | | Re: Duplo parts?
|
|
(...) Skip this. (...) Skip this as well. POV-Ray versions may include it. Steve (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 3960p01.dat - Space Radar Dish 4 x 4 with Red/Green Petals pattern
|
|
Pushing my posting-count up another notch, I forgot to hit this one point, so I'm making another reply... (...) 'Functional' or 'descriptive'? 'Brick' isn't a functional label, except indirectly. Anyway, the categories should fall along the lines of (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 3960p01.dat - Space Radar Dish 4 x 4 with Red/Green Petals pattern
|
|
(...) Right. Except that I seriously think Train should stay. There are many parts which are fairly Train-specific. But there are number of current Train parts that should be moved into other areas. (...) Right. But there are more pressing issues, (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 3960p01.dat, "CYLINDER??? Radar Dish 4 x 4 - Red/Green Petals"
|
|
(...) For now, leave out the 0 CATEGORY metastatement. AFAIK, all programs which look for 0 CATEGORY will grab the first word in the part title as the default category. Steve (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: missing lego-cad primitive: 1-4ring5.dat (modified - POV)
|
|
(...) By the way, do you intend to make your sources available? Maybe event on sourceforge? Then, I could send patches to you instead of pestering you with my pleas for additions ;-) Regards, Hakan (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: missing lego-cad primitive: 1-4ring5.dat (modified - POV)
|
|
(...) Thanks a lot ;-) Expect me to fulfill expectations ;-) (...) I see. Thanks for keeping me informed. (...) It depends. Generally, I just throw the part after the floor definition (inclusive) away, and then add my own floor, background, camera (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Requests
|
|
WOW! Thanks a lot Steve. I also agree with you about the cylinder category. When I sort my LEGO, I have sort all the round plates and round bricks into one section. (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Requests
|
|
Steve, Shouldn't this be (re)oriented, so that it's in the X>0&Z>0 quadrant? You did the plate that way. Franklin (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 4.5 Volt straight track (p/n 3228), different versions ?
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G6JGsx.IsM@lugnet.com... -snip- (...) there. (...) Just a friendly reminder: the lugnet.cad.dat.* heirarchy is for posting .dat files, and for followup discussion to those .dat (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Requests [DAT]
|
|
(...) And here's a mockup for the panel. I'm starting to dislike the "Cylinder" category. First, the name is too specific; there's an implied exclusion of cones, domes, etc. A general "Round" category would be better. The second problem with (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 4.5 Volt straight track (p/n 3228), different versions ?
|
|
In lugnet.trains, James Powell writes: [snip] (...) Another example where this occured was train set #4555 Freight Loading Station (See: (URL) ) Early production runs of this set still contained the "slotted" rail parts, later batches contained the (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Requests [DAT]
|
|
(...) Yeah, I'll be doing these. Here's a mockup of the plate. -- Steve 0 Plate 4 x 4 Corner Round 0 Name: 30565.dat 0 Author: Steve Bliss 0 Unofficial Element 0 CATEGORY Plate 0 KEYWORDS quarter cylinder, quarter disc 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 0 edges 1 16 (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 4.5 Volt straight track (p/n 3228), different versions ?
|
|
(...) I know a little. In considering how to mold a part you have to consider every concave surface carefully. Many things with concave surfaces can nevertheless be made with non dynamic two part molds if you choose the mold separation line (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5 [DAT]
|
|
This part is completed. I duplicated it from the Imperial Shuttle model. 0 Slope Brick 55 1 x 6 x 5 0 Name: 30184.dat 0 Author: Joseph H. Cardana 0 ROTATION CENTER 12 7.06718 113.464 1 "Custom" 0 ROTATION CONFIG 1 1 2 24 -10 16 -10 -10 12 -10 2 24 (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Rough Slope
|
|
(...) wrecker, not wreaker) Now that we know what the benefits are (and if you have any doubts you should go compare the original model, a beauty of a heavy truck, with this improved version. The roughness makes a vast difference), it would be nice (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Extreme Mockup: m_scout.dat Technic MicroScout
|
|
What is there looks good, but it seems to have some problem for me. I loaded it into MLCAD, and the side panels are missing. I can see through the sides, and it comes out in two layers. (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Extreme Mockup: m_scout.dat Technic MicroScout [DAT]
|
|
0 Technic Micro-Scout (very simplified) 0 Name: m_scout.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Un-Official Part 0 rem following line is simplified 2 24 40 0 110 40 0 -110 2 24 -40 0 110 -40 0 -110 2 24 40 0 110 18 0 110 2 24 -40 0 110 -18 0 110 2 24 18 0 110 (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: Panel 10 x 10 x 2 & 2/3 Corner Top [DAT]
|
|
Once again I've done only the minimum. But hey, it works. If anyone wishes to finish it, help yourself. 0 Panel 10 x 10 x 2 & 1/3 Corner Top 0 Name: 30202.dat 0 Author: Joseph H. Cardana 0 Unofficial Model 0 ROTATION CENTER -61.3017 23.8601 21.9011 (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | work-in-progress: pirate tri-corner hat [DAT]
|
|
I'm not yet finished with this part, but I wanted to post what I've got so far, and solicit feedback. Bearing in mind that it's a work that's still "in progress", please LMKWYT. ;-) (Note that this DAT file uses the new primitive that I posted here: (...) (24 years ago, 31-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | new primitive: hi-res 1/8 not-disc [DAT]
|
|
Happy New Millenium ;-) Here's a new primitive that I'm using for a new part that I'm encoding. (I'll be posting the interim version of the part in question in just a few minutes.) Thanks, Franklin 0 Disc Negative 48 0.125 0 Name: 48\1-8ndis.dat 0 (...) (24 years ago, 31-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
