Subject:
|
Re: 3960p01.dat - Space Radar Dish 4 x 4 with Red/Green Petals pattern
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Jan 2001 21:03:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
958 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Steve Bliss writes:
> > In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Franklin W. Cain wrote:
> >
> > > I see a problem with the CATEGORY for this piece.
> > > As a "radar dish", its CATEGORY is "Space",
> > > and yet this specific patterned piece is available
> > > *only* in "Town" sets, and not "Space". :-/
> > >
> > > Please LMKWYT. Thanks.
> >
> > I think "Space" needs to cease to exist as a category, and all the parts in
> > it need to be moved to more rational classifications.
>
> I agree. I'd do the same for town and castle and all the rest. (excepting
> train of course... all other themes exist as spare parts for train)... Ok,
> train too.
Right. Except that I seriously think Train should stay. There are many
parts which are fairly Train-specific. But there are number of current
Train parts that should be moved into other areas.
> More seriously, I believe I've argued in the past for a purely functional
> categorization system. A more robust keyword usage goes a long way to
> letting you recategorize as you see fit, but not all the way.
Right. But there are more pressing issues, which should be resolved before
we do a mass-reorganization on the parts. Specifically, I want source code
control (ie, Parts Tracker) and automated parts downloads/updates ready
before doing major surgery on the categories.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
