 | | MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost) [DAT]
|
|
M.S.F.C. - Minifig Space Flight Center a sub-division of LASA - Lego(tm) Aeronautics and Space Administration 26. April 2000 TO: All concerned parties FROM: Axel F. Poque, Assoc. Admin. MSFC SUBJECT: Full-scale LM model review readiness We are proud (...) (24 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
(...) Wow, that's huge! Unfortunately, it's hard to get the full effect with a DAT file this big. Do you plan on rendering any raytraces? I'm sure that with some nice pics, more people would comment. From what I can tell, though, it looks like (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
All I can say is WOW! That is one of the best models I have seen in a long time! You planing to make a command/service module to match :) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
(...) I got only one at the moment on my Lego page. Go to (URL) post some more when I get L3PAO working again. Now it just dies complaining about the wrong Comdlg32.ocx version. ---...--- -- <`) Axel (F.) Poque /V\ axel.pq@t-online.de powered by |_ (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
Jonathan Wilson <wilsonj@xoommail.com> wrote on lugnet.cad.dat.models: (...) I'd LOVE to. I just haven't figured out how to make a smooth cone for the CSM (yet). ---...--- -- <`) Axel (F.) Poque /V\ axel.pq@t-online.de powered by |_ ][ ]\[ [_] >< (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
(...) For some reason in LDLite, it only gets as far as the bottom of the base, at which point LDLite announces it's done. Bram and Jonathan, which viewers are you using? Anyway, Axel, I'm glad you posted a URL to the rendering. This model is (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
(...) For viewing the model as a whole I'd recommend l3lab (it's fast and it works), and of course for everything else ML-CAD (assuming you have a windows machine). WRT to my L3PAO problem, I just installed the up to date versions of everything I (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
(...) Hmmm. I wonder why L3Lab works where LDLite breaks. Cheers, - jsproat (24 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
(...) I've tried with the current version and I get the same result. If I remove the the piece at which LDLite stops (a 3024, plate 1x1), it jumps to the next submodel (the ascent stage) and renders this, but only to a certain point also. No matter (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
(...) I've tried with the current version and I get the same result. If I remove the the piece at which LDLite stops (a 3024, plate 1x1), it jumps to the next submodel (the ascent stage) and renders this, but only to a certain point also. No matter (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
(...) LDLite has always been slightly flakey on MPD files. I think v1.6 is better than v1.5, but I'm not in a position to make absolute statements--I use L3Lab these days. Steve (24 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | LDLITE cache limit bug (Was Apollo lunar module)
|
|
(...) at (...) works), (...) Yeah, this is a caching bug in the ldlite parser. I get the same problem in ldglite when I use the ldlite parser, but not with the L3 parser. I think it's because one of the caching structures is full before it gets (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
(...) L3Lab. Ldlite often has problems with big MPD files. --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com ---...---oooo-----(_...o---...--- WWW: (URL) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
(...) L3Lab workds great. Thanks all. :-, Gorgeous model. Cheers, - jsproat (24 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: LDLITE cache limit bug (Was Apollo lunar module)
|
|
(...) Heh, um, I also use L3Lab nowadays, actually. :) LDLite v1.6 is better than 1.5 at MPD files. (...) [...] (...) You did it the right way. Actually, the log output should show warnings about files not being cached, although it does not mention (...) (24 years ago, 28-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
I just uploaded two pictures of my Apollo LM to Brickshelf at (URL) planning to render a few more and post them within the next few days. ---...--- Axel (F.) Poque email: axel.pq@t-online.de /__ /\ Internet: (URL) ](__=_`) ---...--- (24 years ago, 30-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models) !
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
Axel, Thats the coolest Space lego vehicle I've ever seen. Makes me want to make one. As a non-cad program possessing member of Lugnet its nice to see the .jpg renderings. (...) (24 years ago, 30-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
Rick Kujawa <spacerocks@iname.com> writes in lugnet.cad.dat.models: (...) If there's demand (and I can figure out how to do it), I might create building instructions for it and post them also. The only problem building one would be finding the right (...) (24 years ago, 30-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
(...) I'm very impressed by your model. Have you considered to enter this beauty in the "Model Of The Month" competition at (URL) ? (Or is that why you are looking for Crater Plates ?) I wish you more of this kind of inspiration, M. Moolhuysen. (24 years ago, 3-May-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
Manfred Moolhuysen <moom@nospamchello.nl> writes in lugnet.cad.dat.models: (...) Thanks! Yes, I've thought of that - I'm trying to get some renderings done at the moment, but there's always so much more to do... :-) ---...--- Axel Poque email: (...) (24 years ago, 6-May-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
