To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 4617
4616  |  4618
Subject: 
Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Thu, 27 Apr 2000 20:54:49 GMT
Viewed: 
596 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Sproaticus wrote:

In lugnet.cad.dat.models, Axel Poqué writes:
In lugnet.cad.dat.models, Jeremy H. Sproat writes:
For some reason in LDLite, it only gets as far as the bottom of the base, at
which point LDLite announces it's done.
For viewing the model as a whole I'd recommend l3lab (it's fast and it works),

Hmmm.  I wonder why L3Lab works where LDLite breaks.

LDLite has always been slightly flakey on MPD files.  I think v1.6 is
better than v1.5, but I'm not in a position to make absolute statements--I
use L3Lab these days.

Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  LDLITE cache limit bug (Was Apollo lunar module)
 
(...) at (...) works), (...) Yeah, this is a caching bug in the ldlite parser. I get the same problem in ldglite when I use the ldlite parser, but not with the L3 parser. I think it's because one of the caching structures is full before it gets (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
 
(...) Hmmm. I wonder why L3Lab works where LDLite breaks. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)

20 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR