 | | Re: Moonbase Observatory
|
|
(...) Wow, two hours have passed and no one else commented on this yet? Well I think it is a great model. Actually when I read the subject of the post I immediately began running through ideas of how I might build a deep space telescope into a (...) (24 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: More Moonbase Madness ...
|
|
These are all very cool and well thought of! I am absolutely stunned about the Pyramid thing (URL) you should use straight regular bricks though to give it a more Egyptian kind of look! I am also trying some more moonbase stuff after the (...) (24 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Moonbase Observatory
|
|
Hello all, Here is my Moonbase version of my Observatory! Photo's: (2 URLs) (deep link) LMKWYT Original Observatory Photo's: (2 URLs) are also some renders of both observatories and several other models: (URL) (24 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.space) !
|
| |
| | Re: PT File Checker Down
|
|
The same is true for the Submit Part page. (...) (24 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | PT File Checker Down
|
|
To whom it may concern: The File Check tool on Parts Tracker seems to be broken. When I hit the submit button, the tool resets itself (clears the file textbox and resets the part type to Parts). I tried several files in different categories and disk (...) (24 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Vader Helmet on Parts tracker
|
|
(...) Mine cost about $25.00 US. All you really need is precision to 1/64 inch since about 1/64 = 1 LDU -Orion (24 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Vader Helmet on Parts tracker
|
|
(...) I'm not in any rush to do so. I'm still gaining experience from doing more symmetrical parts. I can see that the Stormtrooper's helmet could take as long or longer than Vader's helmet. The Rebel helmet could be done in a much shorter time: (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: possible rendering problem with LDLite and transparent parts
|
|
(...) Ok, but I just tested flat.dat with ldlite 2.3 and your command line: ldlite.exe -W2 -MS -S3.0 -C15 -A0.707104,0,0.70710...-0.650895, 0.390731,0.650895 -D1 -U02500,02500 -I-4 -K flat.dat It worked just fine on Win2K with only 192MB. However, I (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: possible rendering problem with LDLite and transparent parts
|
|
(...) I am viewing them at full scale. It's related to the size of the work area, I'm pretty sure, rather than the resolution they're viewed at. 4000x4000 is a pretty good sized chunk of memory, I expect. Gyug sent me a note, he's looking into it. (24 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: possible rendering problem with LDLite and transparent parts
|
|
(...) How are you viewing the resulting image files? Have you looked at them at full scale? Your problem may be aliasing in the resampling of the images when viewed at reduced scale, and not a problem in ldlite. Check with Jacob for tips on how to (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
